...
首页> 外文期刊>Respiration: International Review of Thoracic Diseases >Comparison of hydrofluoroalkane-beclomethasone dipropionate Autohaler with budesonide Turbuhaler in asthma control.
【24h】

Comparison of hydrofluoroalkane-beclomethasone dipropionate Autohaler with budesonide Turbuhaler in asthma control.

机译:氢氟烷烃-倍氯米松双丙酸酯Autohaler与布地奈德Turbuhaler在哮喘控制中的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Hydrofluoroalkane-beclomethasone dipropionate Autohaler (HFA-BDP AH) is a breath-actuated chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)-free metered dose inhaler in which BDP is in a solution of HFA propellant. Budesonide Turbuhaler (BUD TH) is a breath-dependent dry powder inhaler. OBJECTIVES: To test the hypothesis that half the daily dose of HFA-BDP AH would provide an equivalent control of asthma symptoms to the BUD TH. METHODS: This was an 8-week open study in patients with symptomatic moderate-to-severe asthma, previously on BUD 500-1,000 microg x day(-1), or an equivalent. After 5-14 days' run-in, patients were randomized to HFA-BDP AH 800 microg x day(-1) or BUD TH 1,600 microg x day(-1). The intent-to-treat population consisted of 111 patients on HFA-BDP AH and 98 patients on BUD TH. RESULTS: Mean change from baseline in PEF in the morning (AM PEF) at week 8 was 23.95 liters x min(-1) for HFA-BDP AH and 24.46 liters x min(-1) for BUD TH. A two-sided equivalence test using the 0.51 liter x min(-1) difference gave 95% confidence intervals within a defined equivalence interval of (-infinity, 25 liters x min(-1)) indicating that the mean change in AM PEF was equivalent for the two groups. There were no significant differences in the mean change from baseline in FEV1 or beta-agonist use. Patients using HFA-BDP AH had a significantly greater mean change from baseline in the percentage of days free from shortness of breath (p = 0.05), chest tightness (p = 0.02) and nights without sleep disturbance (p = 0.04) at week 3, and wheeze (p = 0.01), shortness of breath (p = 0.02), chest tightness (p < 0.01) and daily asthma symptoms (p = 0.03) at week 8. The incidence, type and severity of adverse events were similar in each group. At week 8, the mean change from baseline in corrected urine cortisol/creatinine ratio in a subgroup of patients was -0.36 for HFA-BDP and -4.88 for BUD TH (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: HFA-BDP 800 microg x day(-1) provided control of moderate-to-severe asthma with efficacy and safety at least similar to BUD TH 1,600 microg x day(-1).
机译:背景:氢氟烷烃-倍氯米松二丙酸酯自动吸入器(HFA-BDP AH)是无呼吸作用的无氯氟烃(CFC)的定量吸入器,其中BDP处于HFA推进剂溶液中。 Budesonide Turbuhaler(BUD TH)是一种与呼吸有关的干粉吸入器。目的:为了检验以下假设,即每天半剂量的HFA-BDP AH可以提供与BUD TH相当的哮喘症状控制。方法:这是一项为期8周的开放性研究,对有症状的中度至重度哮喘患者进行,之前接受BUD 500-1,000 microg x day(-1)或同等水平。磨合5-14天后,将患者随机分为HFA-BDP AH 800微克x天(-1)或BUD TH 1,600微克x天(-1)。意向性治疗人群包括111例HFA-BDP AH患者和98例BUD TH患者。结果:第8周上午PEF(AM PEF)相对于基线的平均变化为HFA-BDP AH为23.95升x min(-1),而BUD TH为24.46升x min(-1)。使用0.51升x min(-1)差的双向当量试验在定义的等价区间(-infinity,25升x min(-1))内给出了95%的置信区间,表明AM PEF的平均变化为相当于两组。 FEV1或β受体激动剂的使用与基线相比的平均变化无显着差异。使用HFA-BDP AH的患者在第3周的无气喘天数(p = 0.05),胸闷(p = 0.02)和无睡眠障碍的夜晚(p = 0.04)的百分比中,与基线相比,平均变化明显更大,在第8周时出现喘息(p = 0.01),呼吸急促(p = 0.02),胸闷(p <0.01)和每日哮喘症状(p = 0.03)。不良事件的发生率,类型和严重程度与每组。在第8周时,HFA-BDP患者的校正后尿皮质醇/肌酐比值相对于基线的平均变化为-0.36,而BUD TH为-4.88(p <0.01)。结论:HFA-BDP 800微克x天(-1)可控制中重度哮喘,其疗效和安全性至少类似于BUD TH 1,600微克x天(-1)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号