首页> 外文期刊>Respiration: International Review of Thoracic Diseases >Effect of different levels of pressure support and proportional assist ventilation on breathing pattern, work of breathing and gas exchange in mechanically ventilated hypercapnic COPD patients with acute respiratory failure.
【24h】

Effect of different levels of pressure support and proportional assist ventilation on breathing pattern, work of breathing and gas exchange in mechanically ventilated hypercapnic COPD patients with acute respiratory failure.

机译:机械通气的高碳酸血症性COPD急性呼吸衰竭患者,不同水平的压力支持和比例辅助通气对呼吸方式,呼吸功和气体交换的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Proportional assist ventilation (PAV) has been shown to maintain better patient-ventilator synchrony than pressure support ventilation (PSV); however, its clinical advantage regarding invasive ventilation of COPD patients has not been clarified. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effect of PAV and PSV on respiratory parameters of hypercapnic COPD patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF). METHODS: Nine intubated hypercapnic COPD patients were placed on the PAV or PSV mode in random sequence. For each mode, four levels (L1-L4) of support were applied. At each level, blood gases, flow, tidal volume (VT), airway pressure (Paw), esophageal pressure (Pes) (n = 7), patient respiratory rate (fp), ventilator rate (fv), missing efforts (ME = fp - fv) were measured. RESULTS: We found increases in ME with increasing levels of PSV but not with PAV. PO2 and VT increased whereas PCO2 decreased significantly with increasing levels of PSV (p < 0.05). With PAV, PCO2 decreased and VT increased significantly onlyat L4 whereas PO2 increased from L1 to L4. Runaways were observed at L3 and L4 of PAV. The pressure-time product (PTP) was determined for effective and missing breaths. The mean total PTP per minute (of effective plus missing breaths) was 160 +/- 57 cm H2O/s.min in PSV and 194 +/- 60 cm H2O/s.min in PAV. CONCLUSION: We conclude that in COPD patients with hypercapnic ARF, with increasing support, PSV causes the appearance of ME whereas PAV develops runaway phenomena, due to the different patient-ventilator interaction; however, these do not limit the improvement of blood gases with the application of both methods.
机译:背景:与压力支持通气(PSV)相比,比例辅助通气(PAV)可以保持更好的患者-呼吸机同步性。然而,其在COPD患者有创通气方面的临床优势尚未明确。目的:比较PAV和PSV对高碳酸血症COPD急性呼吸衰竭(ARF)患者呼吸参数的影响。方法:将9例经插管的高碳酸血症COPD患者以随机顺序置于PAV或PSV模式。对于每种模式,应用了四个级别(L1-L4)的支持。在每个水平上,血气,流量,潮气量(VT),气道压力(Paw),食道压力(Pes)(n = 7),患者呼吸频率(fp),呼吸机频率(fv),努力不足(ME = fp-fv)。结果:我们发现随着PSV水平升高,ME升高,而PAV升高则没有。随着PSV水平的升高,PO2和VT升高,而PCO2显着降低(p <0.05)。使用PAV,仅在L4处PCO2降低而VT显着增加,而PO2从L1升高至L4。在PAV的L3和L4观察到失控。确定有效呼吸和呼吸缺失的压力时间乘积(PTP)。在PSV中,每分钟的平均总PTP(有效呼吸和呼吸缺失)为160 +/- 57 cm H2O / s.min,在PAV中为194 +/- 60 cm H2O / s.min。结论:我们得出结论,在高碳酸血症性ARF的COPD患者中,随着支持的增加,PSV引起ME的出现,而PAV由于不同的患者-呼吸机相互作用而发展为失控现象。然而,这两种方法的应用并不限制血液气体的改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号