首页> 外文期刊>Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries >More than one bag for the world fishery crisis and keys for co-management successes in selected artisanal Latin American shellfisheries.
【24h】

More than one bag for the world fishery crisis and keys for co-management successes in selected artisanal Latin American shellfisheries.

机译:应对世界渔业危机的不止一个袋子,以及拉丁美洲某些手工贝类渔业共同管理成功的关键。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Global concerns about the depletion of marine stocks have been widely documented in industrial fisheries. However, small-scale artisanal fisheries constitute a second component for the world fishery crisis, normally ignored or erroneously lumped into the industrial component. In this paper we first present a brief comparison between industrial and artisanal fisheries, highlighting the differences between them and the differential feasibility for implementing management options. We propose that industrial and artisanal fishery problems have to be treated separately and thus cannot be lumped into a single "fishing bag". Among artisanal fisheries, we focus on coastal benthic shellfisheries, highlighting that their sedentary or sessile nature make them amenable to implement spatially-explicit management tools such as rotation of areas and territorial user rights (TURFs). Then, using long-term catch trends and selected examples, we demonstrate the power and validity of co-management for some Latin American shellfisheries, notably in Chile and Mexico, and stress the need to institutionalize the existent fishery knowledge. Several idiosyncratic properties of co-management in our Latin American examples have been useful to sustain the resources over time, including: (a) allocations of TURFs, (b) Community Fishery Quotas, which may be sub-allocated to families, (c) community-based and family-oriented sociological and organizational context of co-management, which may drive short and long-term market forces..
机译:工业渔业已广泛记录了全球对海洋资源枯竭的担忧。但是,小规模的手工渔业构成了世界渔业危机的第二部分,通常被忽视或错误地归入工业部分。在本文中,我们首先对工业和手工渔业进行简要的比较,着重​​介绍它们之间的差异以及实施管理方案的可行性。我们建议必须分别处理工业和手工渔业问题,因此不能将其归纳为一个“钓鱼袋”。在手工渔业中,我们主要关注沿海底栖贝类渔业,并强调其久坐或无产的性质使其适合实施空间明晰的管理工具,例如区域轮换和领土使用者权利(TURF)。然后,利用长期的捕捞趋势和一些实例,我们证明了对某些拉丁美洲贝类渔业,特别是在智利和墨西哥的共同管理的力量和有效性,并强调了将现有渔业知识制度化的必要性。在我们的拉丁美洲示例中,共同管理的几种特质对于长期维持资源非常有用,包括:(a)TURF的分配,(b)可能分配给家庭的社区渔业配额,(c)共同管理的基于社区和家庭的社会学和组织环境,这可能会推动短期和长期的市场力量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号