首页> 外文期刊>Retina >Agreement among Canadian retina specialists in the determination of treatment eligibility for photodynamic therapy in age-related macular degeneration.
【24h】

Agreement among Canadian retina specialists in the determination of treatment eligibility for photodynamic therapy in age-related macular degeneration.

机译:加拿大视网膜专家之间的协议,用于确定年龄相关性黄斑变性的光动力疗法的治疗资格。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To determine inter- and intraobserver agreement among Canadian retina specialists in their angiographic classification of choroidal neovascularization and their decision to treat with photodynamic therapy. Agreement was also determined between retina specialists and a Reading Center. METHODS: Forty retina specialists graded 24 cases of exudative age-related macular degeneration on two occasions separated by 6 months. Participants were asked to categorize the choroidal neovascularization and indicate if they would treat with photodynamic therapy. Agreement was determined for decision to treat and for interpretation of the fluorescein angiogram. Angiographic interpretation by participants was compared with that of the Reading Center. RESULTS: The kappas among the 40 participants for lesion categorization and treatment decision were 0.43 (95% confidence interval: 0.36-0.52) and 0.29 (95% confidence interval: 0.18-0.42), respectively. The kappa for intraobserver agreement was 0.57 (95% confidence interval: 0.50-0.64) for lesion categorization and 0.58 (95% confidence interval: 0.43-0.74) for treatment decision. The mean percent agreement with the Reading Center for lesion categorization was 65.4%. CONCLUSIONS: There was moderate interobserver agreement for choroidal neovascularization categorization and poor agreement among Canadian retina specialists for decision to treat with photodynamic therapy. There was moderate intraobserver agreement for both treatment decision and lesion categorization. There was moderate agreement between observers and the Reading Center for angiographic choroidal neovascularization categorization.
机译:目的:确定加拿大视网膜专家在脉络膜新血管形成的血管造影分类中以及他们决定采用光动力疗法的过程中在观察者之间和观察者之间的一致性。视网膜专家和阅读中心之间也确定了协议。方法:四十位视网膜专家对两次渗出的年龄相关性黄斑变性进行了分级,分别两次,间隔6个月。要求参与者对脉络膜新生血管进行分类,并指出他们是否将接受光动力疗法治疗。确定同意以决定治疗和解释荧光素血管造影。将参与者的血管造影解释与阅读中心的血管造影解释进行了比较。结果:40位病变分类和治疗决策参与者的kappas分别为0.43(95%置信区间:0.36-0.52)和0.29(95%置信区间:0.18-0.42)。病变分类的观察者一致性的kappa为0.57(95%置信区间:0.50-0.64),治疗决策的kappa值为0.58(95%置信区间:0.43-0.74)。与Reading Center病变分类的平均同意率为65.4%。结论:对于脉络膜新生血管分类,观察者之间存在中等程度的共识,而加拿大视网膜专家之间对于使用光动力疗法进行治疗的决定的共识较差。对于治疗决策和病变分类均存在中等观察者同意。观察员与血管造影脉络膜新血管形成分类的阅读中心之间达成了适度的共识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号