首页> 外文期刊>Remote Sensing of Environment: An Interdisciplinary Journal >A comparative study of different classification techniques for marine oil spill identification using RADARSAT-1 imagery
【24h】

A comparative study of different classification techniques for marine oil spill identification using RADARSAT-1 imagery

机译:使用RADARSAT-1影像识别海洋溢油的不同分类技术的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The discrimination of oil spills and look-alike phenomena (e.g., lowwind area, wind front area and natural slicks) on Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) images is a crucial task in marine oil spill detection. Many classification techniques can be employed for this purpose. In order to make the best use of the large variety of statistical and machine learning classification methods, it is necessary to assess their performance differences and make recommendations for classifier selection and improvement. The objective of this paper is to compare different classification techniques for oil-spill detection in RADARSAT-1 imagery. The data of this study consists of 15 features of 192 oil spills and look-alikes identified by Canadian Ice Service between 2004 and 2008 off Canada's east and west coastal areas. The studied classifiers include the Support Vector Machine (SVM), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), tree-based ensemble classifiers (bagging, bundling and boosting), Generalized Additive Model (GAM) and Penalized Linear Discriminant Analysis (PLDA). Two performance measures, the specificity at fixed sensitivity (80%) and the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), were estimated using cross-validation to evaluate the performance of classifiers at a high sensitivity. Overall, the bundling technique which achieved a median specificity of 90.7%, at sensitivity of 80%, significantly outperformed the second best (i.e. bagging) by 1.5 percentage points, and theworst (i.e. ANN) by 15 percentage points. Themedian values of AUC measure indicated consistent results. Bundling and bagging achieved comparable median AUC values of about 92%, followed by GAM and PLDA, with ANN yielding the smallest. Most classifiers (SVM, bundling and especially PLDA and ANN) performed significantly better on datasets pre-processed by log-transformation and standardization than on the original dataset. These results demonstrate the importance and benefit of selecting the optimal classifiers for oil spill classification, and configuring the classifiers by proper feature construction techniques.
机译:合成孔径雷达(SAR)图像上的溢油和相似现象(例如低风区,风前区和自然浮油)的区分是海洋溢油检测中的关键任务。为此可以采用许多分类技术。为了充分利用各种统计和机器学习分类方法,有必要评估它们的性能差异并为分类器的选择和改进提出建议。本文的目的是比较RADARSAT-1图像中不同类型的漏油检测技术。这项研究的数据包括2004年至2008年加拿大冰服务部在加拿大东西沿海地区发现的192次石油泄漏和相似之处的15个特征。研究的分类器包括支持向量机(SVM),人工神经网络(ANN),基于树的集成分类器(装袋,捆绑和增强),广义加法模型(GAM)和惩罚线性判别分析(PLDA)。使用交叉验证来评估两个性能指标,即固定灵敏度下的特异性(80%)和接收器工作特性(ROC)曲线下的面积(AUC),以评估分类器在高灵敏度下的性能。总体而言,捆绑技术在90%的敏感性下达到90.7%的中位特异性,明显优于次优(即装袋)1.5个百分点和最差(即ANN)15个百分点。 AUC测量的主题值表明结果一致。捆绑和装袋的可比AUC值中位数约为92%,其次是GAM和PLDA,其中ANN最小。大多数分类器(SVM,捆绑软件,尤其是PLDA和ANN)在通过对数转换和标准化预处理的数据集上的表现要明显优于原始数据集。这些结果证明了为溢油分类选择最佳分类器并通过适当的特征构造技术配置分类器的重要性和益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号