首页> 外文期刊>Remote Sensing of Environment: An Interdisciplinary Journal >Evaluation of optical remote sensing to estimate actual evapotranspiration and canopy conductance
【24h】

Evaluation of optical remote sensing to estimate actual evapotranspiration and canopy conductance

机译:评估光学遥感以估算实际蒸散量和冠层电导

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We compared estimates of actual evapotranspiration (ET) produced with six different vegetation measures derived from the MODerate resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and three contrasting estimation approaches using measurements from eddy covariance flux towers at 16 FLUXNET sites located over six different land cover types. The aim was to assess optimal approaches in using optical remote sensing to estimate ET. The first two approaches directly regressed various MODIS vegetation indices (VIs) and products such as leaf area index (LAI) and fraction of photosynthetically active radiation (fPAR) with ET and evaporative fraction (EF). In the third approach, the Penman-Monteith (PM) equation was inverted to obtain surface conductance (G_s), for dry plant canopies. The G_s values were then regressed against the MODIS data products and used to parameterize the PM equation for retrievals of ET. Jack-Knife cross-validation was used to evaluate the various regression models against observed ET. The PM-G_s approach provided the lowest root mean square error (RMSE), and highest determination coefficients (R~2) across all sites, with an average RMSE=38Wm~(-2) and R~2=0.72. Direct regressions of observed ET against the VIs resulted in an average RMSE=60Wm~(-2) and R~2=0.22, while the EF regressions an average RMSE=42Wm-2 and R~2=0.64. The MODIS LAI and fPAR product produced the poorest estimates of ET (RMSE>44Wm~(-2) and R~2<0.6); while the VIs each performed best for some of the land cover types. The enhanced vegetation index (EVI) produced the best ET estimates for evergreen needleleaf forest (RMSE=28.4Wm~(-2), R~2=0.66). The normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) best estimated ET in grassland (RMSE=23.8Wm~(-2) and R~2=0.68), cropland (RMSE=29.2Wm~(-2) and R~2=0.86) and woody savannas (RMSE=25.4Wm~(-2) and R~2=0.82), while the VI-based crop coefficient (K_c) yielded the best estimates for evergreen and deciduous broadleaf forests (RMSE=27Wm~(-2) and R~2=0.7 in both cases). Using the ensemble-average of ET as estimated using NDVI, EVI and K_c we computed global grids of dry canopy conductance (G_c) from which annual statistics were extracted to characterise different functional types. The resulting G_c values can be used to parameterize land surface models.
机译:我们比较了使用MODerate分辨率成像光谱仪(MODIS)得出的六种不同植被测量值和使用六种不同土地覆盖类型的16个FLUXNET站点的涡度协方差通量塔的测量值得出的三种对比估计方法所产生的实际蒸散量(ET)的估计值。目的是评估使用光学遥感估算ET的最佳方法。前两种方法直接回归了各种MODIS植被指数(VI)和产品,例如叶面积指数(LAI)以及具有ET和蒸发分数(EF)的光合有效辐射分数(fPAR)。在第三种方法中,将Penman-Monteith(PM)方程反过来以获得干植物冠层的表面电导(G_s)。然后,将G_s值针对MODIS数据乘积进行回归,并用于对PM方程进行参数化以检索ET。使用Jack-Knife交叉验证对观察到的ET评估各种回归模型。 PM-G_s方法在所有站点上提供了最低的均方根误差(RMSE)和最高的确定系数(R〜2),平均RMSE = 38Wm〜(-2)和R〜2 = 0.72。观察到的ET对VI的直接回归导致平均RMSE = 60Wm〜(-2)和R〜2 = 0.22,而EF回归平均RMSE = 42Wm-2和R〜2 = 0.64。 MODIS LAI和fPAR乘积产生的ET估计最差(RMSE> 44Wm〜(-2)和R〜2 <0.6)。而VI在某些土地覆盖类型中表现最佳。植被指数(EVI)的提高为常绿针叶林的最佳ET估算值(RMSE = 28.4Wm〜(-2),R〜2 = 0.66)。草原(RMSE = 23.8Wm〜(-2)和R〜2 = 0.68),农田(RMSE = 29.2Wm〜(-2)和R〜2 = 0.86)和植被的归一化差异植被指数(NDVI)最佳估计ET和木本稀树草原(RMSE = 25.4Wm〜(-2)和R〜2 = 0.82),而基于VI的作物系数(K_c)对常绿和落叶阔叶林(RMSE = 27Wm〜(-2)和在两种情况下,R〜2 = 0.7)。使用NDVI,EVI和K_c估算的ET的总体平均值,我们计算了干冠层电导(G_c)的全局网格,并从中提取了年度统计数据以表征不同的功能类型。所得的G_c值可用于参数化地面模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号