首页> 外文期刊>Research in social & administrative pharmacy: RSAP >Medicines in Australian nursing homes: A cross-sectional observational study of the accuracy and suitability of re-packing medicines into pharmacy-supplied dose administration aids
【24h】

Medicines in Australian nursing homes: A cross-sectional observational study of the accuracy and suitability of re-packing medicines into pharmacy-supplied dose administration aids

机译:澳大利亚疗养院中的药物:将药物重新包装成药房提供的剂量管理工具的准确性和适用性的横断面观察性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Though staff at Australian nursing homes (NHs) commonly administer medicines that have been re-packed into dose administration aids (DAAs) that organize medicines according to dose schedule, these pharmacy-supplied devices have not been extensively evaluated in the Australian setting. Objective: To audit the accuracy and suitability of re-packing medicines into DAAs (blister packs or sachets) for NHs and identify the proportion of DAAs with inaccurate or unsuitable medicine re-packing. Methods: Between January and June 2011, pharmacist researchers visited 49 randomly and purposively selected NHs from rural, regional, and metropolitan Victoria (Australia) to audit a sample of residents' newly prepared DAAs that contained all of their regularly re-packed medicines for 1 week. Over 1 or 2 days, the pharmacy-supplied DAAs were compared with the current prescriber-prepared NH medicine chart. Any occurrences of inaccurately re-packed medicines (discrepancies, with verification as necessary) or unsuitable medicine re-packing were recorded as DAA incidents and descriptive statistics was used to analyze the data. Results: Six hundred and eighty-four incidents occurring in 457 DAAs were detected from a total of 3959 DAAs audited for 1757 residents (incident rate of 11.5% of DAAs) from 49 participating NHs. Incidents were detected in 10.5% of blister packs and 14.5% of sachets. The top five incidents were unsuitable re-packing according to pharmaceutical guidelines (50.1%); added medicine (9.8%); incorrect quantity re-packed (5.4%); omitted medicine (5.3%); and damaged medicine (5.1%). Conclusions: The incident rate of inaccurate or unsuitable medicine re-packing within DAAs supplied to NHs for use in medicine administration was higher than in previous research. Recommendations include using current findings in conjunction with further research to develop a quality improvement initiative to reduce DAA incident rates and improve NH standard of care.
机译:背景:尽管澳大利亚疗养院(NHs)的工作人员通常会管理重新包装成剂量管理辅助工具(DAA)的药物,这些药物会根据剂量时间表对药物进行组织,但是在澳大利亚,这些药房提供的设备尚未得到广泛的评估。目的:审核将药物重新包装到NHs的DAA(泡罩包装或药袋)中的准确性和适用性,并确定不正确或不合适的药物重新包装的DAA的比例。方法:在2011年1月至2011年6月之间,药剂师研究人员随机访问了49个来自农村,区域和大都会维多利亚州(澳大利亚)的NHs,以对居民新制备的DAA样本进行审核,这些DAA包含所有常规重新包装的药物1周。在1或2天内,将药房提供的DAA与当前处方药制备的NH药物图表进行比较。重新包装不正确的药品(出现差异,必要时进行验证)或不适当包装的任何事件都记录为DAA事件,并使用描述性统计数据来分析数据。结果:在49个参与调查的国家中,共对1757名居民进行了3959次DAA审计,共发现644个DAA事件(事件发生率为11.5%)。在10.5%的泡罩包装和14.5%的香囊中发现了事件。根据药品指南,最重的五个事件是不合适的重新包装(50.1%);加药(9.8%);重新包装的数量不正确(5.4%);遗漏药物(5.3%);和损坏的药品(5.1%)。结论:提供给NHs用于药物管理的DAA中不准确或不合适的药物重新包装的发生率高于以前的研究。建议包括结合当前研究结果和进一步研究,制定质量改进计划,以降低DAA发生率并提高NH保健标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号