...
首页> 外文期刊>Radiology >Acute appendicitis: comparison of helical CT diagnosis focused technique with oral contrast material versus nonfocused technique with oral and intravenous contrast material.
【24h】

Acute appendicitis: comparison of helical CT diagnosis focused technique with oral contrast material versus nonfocused technique with oral and intravenous contrast material.

机译:急性阑尾炎:螺旋CT诊断聚焦技术与口服造影剂对比非聚焦技术与口服和静脉造影剂对比。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of focused helical computed tomography (CT) with orally administered contrast material with that of nonfocused helical CT with orally and intravenously administered contrast material. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After receiving oral contrast material, 228 patients with clinically suspected appendicitis underwent focused appendiceal CT (5-mm section thickness, 15-cm coverage in the right lower quadrant). Immediately thereafter, helical CT of the entire abdomen and pelvis was performed following intravenous administration of contrast material (abdomen, 7-mm section thickness; pelvis, 5-mm section thickness). Studies were separated and independently interpreted by three observers who were blinded to patient names. Diagnoses were established by means of surgical and/or clinical follow-up findings. RESULTS: Fifty-one (22.4%) of 228 patients had acute appendicitis. Readers diagnosed appendicitis with 83.3%, 73.8%, and 71.4% sensitivity and 93.0%, 92.3%, and 97.9% specificity with focused nonenhanced appendiceal CT. Readers diagnosed appendicitis with 92.9%, 92.9%, and 88.1% sensitivity and 93.7%, 95.1%, and 96.5% specificity with nonfocused enhanced CT. Summary areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve estimates for focused nonenhanced and nonfocused enhanced CT were 0.916 and 0.964, respectively; the differences were statistically significant (P <.05) for two of three readers. All readers demonstrated higher sensitivities for detecting the inflamed appendix with nonfocused enhanced CT. Appendicitis was missed with focused CT in two patients whose inflamed appendix was not included in the imaging of the right lower quadrant. All readers were significantly more confident in diagnosing alternative conditions with nonfocused enhanced CT. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic accuracy of helical CT for acute appendicitis improved significantly with use of intravenous contrast material.
机译:目的:比较经口对比剂的聚焦螺旋CT和不经口对比剂的非螺旋CT的诊断准确性。材料与方法:228例临床怀疑阑尾炎患者在接受口服对比剂后,进行了聚焦阑尾CT检查(5毫米切片厚度,右下象限15厘米覆盖范围)。此后立即在静脉内注射造影剂(腹部,切片厚度为7毫米;骨盆,切片厚度为5毫米)后,对整个腹部和骨盆进行螺旋CT检查。研究由三名不了解患者姓名的观察员分开并独立解释。通过手术和/或临床随访发现确定诊断。结果:228名患者中有51名(22.4%)患有急性阑尾炎。读者通过聚焦的非增强阑尾CT诊断出阑尾炎的敏感性为83.3%,73.8%和71.4%,特异性为93.0%,92.3%和97.9%。读者通过非聚焦增强CT诊断阑尾炎的敏感性为92.9%,92.9%和88.1%,特异性为93.7%,95.1%和96.5%。聚焦非增强CT和非聚焦增强CT的接收机工作特性曲线估计下的摘要区域分别为0.916和0.964;对于三位读者中的两位,差异具有统计学意义(P <.05)。所有读者均表现出更高的灵敏度,可通过非聚焦增强CT检测发炎的阑尾。聚焦CT漏诊了两名右下腹影像学未包括阑尾发炎的患者。所有读者对于非聚焦增强CT诊断替代疾病的信心大大增强。结论:螺旋CT对急性阑尾炎的诊断准确性通过使用静脉造影剂得以显着提高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号