...
首页> 外文期刊>Radiology >Bowel preparation for CT colonography: blinded comparison of magnesium citrate and sodium phosphate for catharsis.
【24h】

Bowel preparation for CT colonography: blinded comparison of magnesium citrate and sodium phosphate for catharsis.

机译:肠CT肠造影准备:柠檬酸镁和磷酸钠用于导盲的盲法比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To compare colonic cleansing and fluid retention of double-dose magnesium citrate with those of single-dose sodium phosphate in patients undergoing computed tomographic (CT) colonography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective HIPAA-compliant clinical study had institutional review board approval; informed consent was waived. The study included 118 consecutive patients given single-dose sodium phosphate for bowel catharsis and 115 consecutive patients at risk for phosphate nephropathy, who were instead given double-dose magnesium citrate. The bowel preparation regimen was otherwise identical. Four-point scales were used to assess residual stool and fluid in the six colonic segments, and attenuation of residual fluid was measured. An a priori power analysis was performed, and unpaired t tests with Welch correction were used to compare the two groups on stool and fluid scores and fluid attenuation. RESULTS: Both cathartic regimens offered excellent colon cleansing, with no significant difference for residual stool in any of the six segments. Stool scores of 1 or 2 (ie, no residual stool or residual stool <5 mm) were recorded in 88.6% (627 of 708) of colonic segments in the sodium phosphate group and in 88.1% (608 of 690) in the magnesium citrate group. No clinically important differences were seen in residual fluid scores in any of the six segments, with the only significant difference seen in the sigmoid colon (2.17 for sodium phosphate vs 2.44 for magnesium citrate; P< 0.01). Fluid attenuation was significantly different between magnesium citrate and sodium phosphate groups (790 HU +/- 216 vs 978 HU +/- 160; P <.001). CONCLUSION: Both sodium phosphate and magnesium citrate provided excellent colon cleansing for CT colonography. Residual stool and fluid were similar in both groups, and fluid attenuation values were closer to optimal in the magnesium citrate group. Since bowel preparation provided by both cathartics was comparable, magnesium citrate should be considered for CT colonography, particularly in patients at risk for phosphate nephropathy.
机译:目的:比较双剂量柠檬酸镁和单剂量磷酸钠在进行计算机断层扫描(CT)结肠造影的患者中的结肠清洗和液体保留。材料与方法:这项符合HIPAA的回顾性临床研究已获得机构审查委员会的批准;知情同意书被放弃。该研究包括118名连续患者接受单剂量磷酸钠用于肠通便和115名连续患者有磷酸盐肾病的风险,而他们则接受了双剂量柠檬酸镁。否则肠准备方案是相同的。四点量表用于评估六个结肠段中的残余粪便和体液,并测量残余液的衰减。进行先验功率分析,并使用未配对的t检验和Welch校正来比较两组的粪便和体液得分以及体液衰减。结果:两种导尿方案均能提供出色的结肠清洁效果,在六个部位中任何一个部位的残余粪便均无显着差异。在磷酸钠组的结肠段中88.6%(708的627个)和在柠檬酸镁中的88.1%(690的608个)中记录的粪便得分为1或2(即没有残留的粪便或残留的粪便<5 mm)。组。在六个节段中的任何一个节段中,在残留液体分值上均未见临床上重要的差异,在乙状结肠中观察到唯一的显着差异(磷酸钠为2.17,柠檬酸镁为2.44; P <0.01)。柠檬酸镁和磷酸钠组之间的液体衰减显着不同(790 HU +/- 216 vs 978 HU +/- 160; P <.001)。结论:磷酸钠和柠檬酸镁均能为CT结肠造影提供出色的结肠清洁效果。两组的残余粪便和体液相似,柠檬酸镁组的体液衰减值更接近最佳值。由于两种导尿剂提供的肠准备是可比的,因此应考虑将柠檬酸镁用于CT结肠造影,尤其是在有发生磷酸肾病风险的患者中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号