...
首页> 外文期刊>Nicotine & Tobacco Research >Recommendation for the assessment of tobacco craving and withdrawal in smoking cessation trials
【24h】

Recommendation for the assessment of tobacco craving and withdrawal in smoking cessation trials

机译:在戒烟试验中评估烟瘾和戒烟建议

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper addresses methodological issues in the assessment of nicotine withdrawal and craving in clinical trials of smoking cessation therapies. We define withdrawal as a syndrome of behavioral, affective, cognitive, and physiological symptoms, typically transient, emerging upon cessation or reduction of tobacco use and causing distress or impairment of behavioral function. Offset effects (effects related to removal of a direct nicotine effect) are sustained effects of cessation or reduction of tobacco use that cause distress or impairment. Withdrawal and craving are important as potential predictors of relapse, as mediators and markers of treatment effects, and as clinical phenomena in their own right. Symptoms recommended for assessment include craving, irritability, depression, restlessness, sleep disturbance, difficulty concentrating, increased appetite, and weight gain; anxiety deserves further study. We recommend reporting of data on each of these individual symptoms, and use of multiple-item assessments. Although some standardized measures of withdrawal have promising psychometric properties, no measure has yet fully established its reliability, validity, and broad applicability and, therefore, we do not currently favor universal adoption of any one measure. Assessment of objective indices of withdrawal (e.g., hormonal changes) is currently technically challenging and of unknown value. Although weekly assessment may suffice in some large trials, more intensive measurement can provide better sensitivity. Analyses of withdrawal should include baseline measures and be sensitive to potential instability in baseline. Analytic approaches should take into account potential bias when only abstinent subjects are examined. Conversely, heterogeneity should be considered when smoking subjects are included in intent-to-treat analyses. Withdrawal data from clinical trials focused on assessing abstinence rates may be biased because of progressive subject loss to dropout and relapse; different designs and approaches are needed to investigate the process and natural history of craving and withdrawal.
机译:本文探讨了戒烟治疗临床试验中评估尼古丁戒断和渴望的方法学问题。我们将戒断定义为行为,情感,认知和生理症状的综合症,通常是短暂的,在停止或减少吸烟量后出现,并引起困扰或行为功能受损。抵销效应(与消除直接尼古丁效应有关的效应)是戒烟或减少使用烟草造成的困扰或损害的持续影响。戒断和渴望对于复发的潜在预测,作为治疗效果的中介物和标志物,以及自身的临床现象都很重要。建议评估的症状包括渴望,烦躁,沮丧,躁动,睡眠障碍,注意力不集中,食欲增加和体重增加;焦虑值得进一步研究。我们建议报告有关每种个体症状的数据,并使用多项评估。尽管一些标准的戒断措施具有令人信服的心理测量特性,但尚无一种措施能够完全确定其可靠性,有效性和广泛的适用性,因此,我们目前不赞成任何一种措施的普遍采用。目前评估客观戒断指数(例如荷尔蒙变化)在技术上具有挑战性,价值未知。尽管在某些大型试验中,每周评估可能就足够了,但是更深入的测量可以提供更好的敏感性。戒断的分析应包括基线测量,并对基线的潜在不稳定敏感。当仅检查禁欲对象时,分析方法应考虑潜在的偏见。相反,将吸烟对象纳入意向性治疗分析时应考虑异质性。由于受试者逐渐丧失,辍学和复发,从专注于评估戒断率的临床试验中退出的数据可能会有偏差。需要不同的设计和方法来调查渴望和戒断的过程和自然历史。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号