...
首页> 外文期刊>Land Use Policy >Technological driving forces of LUCC: Conceptualization, quantification, and the example of urban power distribution networks
【24h】

Technological driving forces of LUCC: Conceptualization, quantification, and the example of urban power distribution networks

机译:LUCC的技术驱动力:概念化,量化和城市配电网络示例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Consideration of technology is important for understanding the driving forces of human induced land-use and land-cover changes (LUCC). However, technological driving forces (TechDF) are seldom considered in quantitative analyses of LUCC because technology is difficult to quantify. In this paper we suggest addressing this difficulty by deducing quantification rationales from conceptualizations. We use the example of a comparative study of urban medium-voltage networks (MV networks) and urban land-use distribution to illustrate our approach. First, we outline how the effect of TechDF on LUCC can be conceptualized based on `contextualism', a position concerning the role of technology in social and environmental change, and contrast this with the more common assumption of technological determinism. We outline further how MV networks can be conceptualized based on network genealogy, deduce a quantification rationale based on contextualism and network genealogy, and quantify MV networks. As a result of our case study we find that based on contextualism and network genealogy, the Tech DF of MV networks can be conceptualized as relational graphs of supplier-consumer interactions. Thus, the supplier-consumer-land-use interactions are specific for each context, for example for each city. A number of graph-theoretic measures of network topology provide a corresponding quantification rationale. Second, we use the results of a statistical analysis to discuss whether the quantification and quantification rationale for MV networks correspond to the conceptualization of MV networks based on contextualism and network genealogy. We answer this question broadly in the affirmative. Third, we discuss the issues that remain ambiguous for a conclusive answer. We also discuss the results of the statistical analysis in the light of comparative studies of urban land-use distribution. In conclusion, we regard combining conceptualization, quantification rationale, and quantification as promising in overcoming difficulties with the quantification of Tech DF in general.
机译:对技术的考虑对于理解人类引起的土地利用和土地覆被变化(LUCC)的驱动力很重要。但是,由于技术难以量化,因此在LUCC的定量分析中很少考虑技术驱动力(TechDF)。在本文中,我们建议通过从概念化推论得出量化原理来解决这一难题。我们以城市中压网络(MV网络)和城市土地利用分布的比较研究为例来说明我们的方法。首先,我们概述了如何基于“情境主义”概念化TechDF对LUCC的影响,这是关于技术在社会和环境变化中的作用的立场,并将其与更普遍的技术决定论假设进行对比。我们进一步概述了如何基于网络家谱对MV网络进行概念化,基于上下文主义和网络家谱推论出量化原理,并对MV网络进行量化。作为我们案例研究的结果,我们发现基于上下文和网络家谱,可以将MV网络的Tech DF概念化为供应商与消费者互动的关系图。因此,供应商-消费者-土地使用的交互作用对于每种情况都是特定的,例如对于每个城市。网络拓扑的许多图论度量提供了相应的量化依据。其次,我们使用统计分析的结果来讨论MV网络的量化和量化原理是否与基于情境主义和网络家谱的MV网络的概念化相对应。我们肯定地广泛回答这个问题。第三,我们讨论仍未明确答案的问题。我们还将根据对城市土地利用分布的比较研究来讨论统计分析的结果。总而言之,我们认为将概念化,量化原理和量化相结合在克服Tech DF量化方面的困难方面很有前途。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号