首页> 外文期刊>Legal and criminological psychology >Exploring liars' strategies for creating deceptive reports
【24h】

Exploring liars' strategies for creating deceptive reports

机译:探索说谎者创建欺骗性报告的策略

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Most past research on detecting deception has relied on the assumption that liars often fabricate a story to account for their whereabouts, whereas truth tellers simply recall an autobiographical memory. However, little research has examined whether liars, when free to choose the topic of their own reports, will actually choose to fabricate information rather than use a different strategy for constructing their lies. We describe two studies that evaluated liars' strategies for selecting the content of their lies when given the freedom to choose whatever content they desired. Method. In Studies 1 (N= 35) and 2 (N= 22) participants (a) described a truthful story in order to identify a salient event, then (b) lied about the event, and finally (c) described their strategies for choosing the content of the reported lies. Results. Liars overwhelmingly chose to report a previously experienced event for the time period they were to be deceptive about (67% and 86% in Studies 1 and 2, respectively). The majority of discrete details reported were experienced, occurred relatively frequently, occurred relatively recently, and were typical or routine. Conclusions. These findings have significant implications for the development of cognitive-based interventions for detecting deception. In particular, some methods of deception that rely on content analysis may be ineffective if liars choose to report previous experiences rather than outright fabrications.
机译:过去有关检测欺骗的大多数研究都基于这样的假设,即说谎者经常编造一个故事来说明其下落,而真相讲述者只是想起自传的记忆。但是,很少有研究检查撒谎者在自由选择自己报告的主题时,是否会选择伪造信息,而不是使用其他策略来构造谎言。我们描述了两项研究,评估了说谎者在自由选择自己想要的内容时可以选择谎言内容的策略。方法。在研究1(N = 35)和2(N = 22)中,参与者(a)描述了一个真实的故事以识别一个突出事件,然后(b)对该事件撒谎,最后(c)描述了他们的选择策略报告的谎言的内容。结果。骗子压倒性地选择报告一个他们曾经具有欺骗性的经历(在研究1和2中分别为67%和86%)。所报告的大多数离散细节都是有经验的,发生频率相对较高,发生时间相对较近,并且是典型的或常规的。结论这些发现对检测欺骗的基于认知的干预措施的发展具有重要意义。特别是,如果说谎者选择报告以前的经历而不是直接捏造,则依赖内容分析的某些欺骗方法可能无效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号