...
首页> 外文期刊>Langmuir: The ACS Journal of Surfaces and Colloids >Surface energy determinations of wood: Comparison of methods and wood species
【24h】

Surface energy determinations of wood: Comparison of methods and wood species

机译:木材的表面能测定:方法和木材种类的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Lifshitz-van der Waals, acid-base, and total surface free energies of various wood species were calculated from contact angle measurements. For spruce (Picea abies) and meranti (Shorea spp.) the following three methods were compared: capillary rise in wood powder columns (based on the Washburn equation), dynamic contact angle measurements (according to the Wilhelmy-plate principle), and sessile drop measurements along and across the grain of the wood. The capillary rise method was limited to nonswelling solvents, which means that only the Lifshitz-van der Waals component could be measured. With the dynamic contact angle measurement, the wettability during the first immersion was decreased compared to that of the sessile drop. This was probably due to reduced capillary penetration, but with the second immersion the presence of an adsorbed solvent layer increased the wettability and hence affected the surface energy data. The sessile drop measurements were highly dependent on the direction of measurement. Increasing the wood moisture content decreased the Lifshitz-van der Waals component and increased the basic surface energy parameter of the wood. All of the wood species tec;ted were characterized as having low-energy surfaces with a dominant Lifshitz-van der Waals component. Measurement of acid and base parameters of wood surfaces seemed not to be very reliable because of its strong dependence on the measuring conditions. With respect to this, it should be noted that thermodynamic equilibrium conditions assumed by Young's equation are generally not fulfilled with wood surface a because of chemical heterogeneity, surface roughness, and the adsorption of the test solvent. [References: 45]
机译:Lifshitz-van der Waals的酸碱度和各种木材物种的总表面自由能由接触角测量值计算得出。对于云杉(Picea abies)和柳桉(Shorea spp。),比较了以下三种方法:木粉柱中的毛细管上升(基于Washburn方程),动态接触角测量(根据Wilhelmy-plate原理)和无柄沿着木纹和整个木纹进行落差测量。毛细管上升方法仅限于非溶胀性溶剂,这意味着只能测量Lifshitz-van der Waals组分。通过动态接触角测量,与无滴液滴相比,第一次浸没期间的润湿性降低了。这可能是由于毛细渗透减少,但是在第二次浸泡中,吸附的溶剂层的存在增加了润湿性,因此影响了表面能数据。无柄滴的测量高度依赖于测量的方向。木材含水量的增加降低了Lifshitz-van der Waals组分,并增加了木材的基本表面能参数。所有受保护的木材种类均具有低能表面,且主要成分为Lifshitz-van der Waals组分。木材表面酸和碱参数的测量似乎不太可靠,因为它强烈依赖于测量条件。关于这一点,应该注意的是,由于化学异质性,表面粗糙度和测试溶剂的吸附,木材表面a通常不满足由杨氏方程式假设的热力学平衡条件。 [参考:45]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号