首页> 外文期刊>Landscape and Urban Planning >Beyond the view: Future directions in landscape aesthetics research
【24h】

Beyond the view: Future directions in landscape aesthetics research

机译:超越视野:景观美学研究的未来方向

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The dominant view of landscape research in the latter half of the 20th century saw landscape aesthetics as a discrete area of study, a socio-cultural value detached from other considerations. This view was later challenged by proponents of ecological aesthetics, who countered that what makes landscapes beautiful is often intimately linked to other intrinsic landscape values, such as biodiversity, and that these other values can shift perceptions of how we perceive and appreciate the beauty of landscapes. At the same time, environmental psychologists and others wrestled with questions regarding the extent to which landscape aesthetics had a biological or cultural basis, and examined the impact of individual differences and life experiences. More recently landscape urbanism has reexamined the drivers of urban landscape change, prompting questions of whether landscape aesthetics should be abandoned in favour of landscape pragmatism and instrumentality. Furthermore, new understandings of how we might best sustain biological diversity in the context of global climate change signal an end to the perceived biological status quo and the advent of an aesthetics of necessity. This essay outlines these trends and explores their implications for researching landscape aesthetics
机译:在20世纪后半叶,景观研究的主流观点将景观美学视为一个独立的研究领域,其社会文化价值与其他考虑因素脱节。这种观点后来受到生态美学支持者的挑战,他们反对使景观变得美丽的事物通常与其他固有的景观价值(例如生物多样性)密切相关,并且这些其他价值可以改变我们对景观美感的认识。 。同时,环境心理学家和其他人就景观美学在多大程度上具有生物学或文化基础的问题w之以鼻,并研究了个体差异和生活经历的影响。最近,景观城市主义重新审视了城市景观变化的驱动力,引发了人们是否应该放弃景观美学而转向景观实用主义和工具主义的问题。此外,对我们如何在全球气候变化的背景下如何最好地维持生物多样性的新认识,标志着人们所感知的生物现状的终结和必要美学的问世。本文概述了这些趋势,并探讨了它们对景观美学研究的意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号