...
首页> 外文期刊>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions: Official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions >Two-year follow-up of the Genous endothelial progenitor cell capturing stent versus the Taxus Liberte stent in patients with de novo coronary artery lesions with a high-risk of restenosis: a randomized, single-center, pilot study.
【24h】

Two-year follow-up of the Genous endothelial progenitor cell capturing stent versus the Taxus Liberte stent in patients with de novo coronary artery lesions with a high-risk of restenosis: a randomized, single-center, pilot study.

机译:Genous内皮祖细胞捕获支架与Taxus Liberte支架对再狭窄风险高的新生冠状动脉病变患者的两年随访:一项随机,单中心,先导性研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: In the prospective randomized TRIAS pilot study, the bio-engineered Genous endothelial progenitor cell capturing stent was compared with the Taxus Liberte SR paclitaxel-eluting stent. At 1 yr, a statistically nonsignificant difference in the rates of target vessel failure (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization) was observed. We have evaluated the safety and efficacy up to 2 yr. METHODS: A total of 193 patients with de novo coronary artery lesions carrying a high risk of restenosis were randomized to a Genous stent versus a Taxus stent. Dual antiplatelet therapy was prescribed for >/=1 month after Genous stent implantation and for >/=6 months after a Taxus stent. RESULTS: Between 1 and 2 yr, patients treated with the Genous stent tended to have fewer episodes of target lesion revascularization (2.0% versus 5.3%), but nearly similar rates of cardiac death (1.0% versus 0%), myocardial infarction (0% versus 1.1%), and stent thrombosis (0% versus 1.1%) when compared with the Taxus stent. As a result, at 2-yr follow-up treatment with the Genous stent compared with the Taxus stent resulted in a nonsignificant difference in target vessel failure (TVR) (20.4% versus 15.8%; risk difference 4.6%, 95% CI -6.2-15.5%). No stent thrombosis was observed in the Genous group compared to five cases (in four patients) in the Taxus group, resulting in a difference as compared with the Taxus stent (risk difference -4.2%; 95%CI -8.2% to -0.2%). CONCLUSIONS: In the TRIAS pilot study, treatment of coronary artery lesions carrying a high risk of restenosis with the Genous compared with the Taxus stent resulted in a nonsignificant difference of TVR at 2-yr follow-up, with convergence of the Kaplan-Meier curves between 1 and 2 yr. Stent thrombosis was only observed after Taxus stent implantation.
机译:背景:在前瞻性TRIAS随机前瞻性研究中,将生物工程的Genous内皮祖细胞捕获支架与Taxus Liberte SR紫杉醇洗脱支架进行了比较。在1年时,观察到目标血管衰竭率(心脏死亡,心肌梗塞或目标血管血运重建)的统计学差异无统计学意义。我们已经评估了长达2年的安全性和有效性。方法:将193例具有高再狭窄风险的从头冠状动脉新病变的患者随机分为Genous支架和Taxus支架。在Genous支架植入后> / = 1个月内和在Taxus支架植入后> / = 6个月内开具双重抗血小板治疗。结果:在1至2年间,使用Genous支架治疗的患者发生靶病变血运重建的几率更低(2.0%对5.3%),但心源性死亡率(1.0%对0%),心肌梗死(0与Taxus支架相比,%和1.1%)和支架血栓形成(0%和1.1%)。结果,在2年的随访中,Genous支架与Taxus支架相比,目标血管衰竭(TVR)差异无统计学意义(20.4%比15.8%;风险差异4.6%,95%CI -6.2 -15.5%)。在Genous组中未观察到支架血栓形成,相比之下,Taxus组中有5例(4例患者),与Taxus支架相比存在差异(风险差异为-4.2%; 95%CI为-8.2%至-0.2% )。结论:在TRIAS的初步研究中,Genous与Taxus支架相比治疗冠状动脉病变具有较高的再狭窄风险,导致2年随访时TVR差异无统计学意义,Kaplan-Meier曲线趋于收敛1至2年之间。仅在红豆杉支架植入后才观察到支架血栓形成。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号