首页> 外文期刊>Nursing inquiry >Gender, sexuality and the participatory dimensions of a comparative life history policy study.
【24h】

Gender, sexuality and the participatory dimensions of a comparative life history policy study.

机译:比较生活史政策研究的性别,性行为和参与性维度。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Gender, sexuality and the participatory dimensions of a comparative life history policy study In this paper, I explore how a critical feminist lens was a crucial element in creating a participatory policy study which used a qualitative design and comparative life history methodology. This study focused on Canadian nurses' political practice related to advocacy for lesbian health. Findings show that the combination of the gender lens and life history approach offers potential to create knowledge in ways aligned with health-promoting and emancipatory outcomes. However, the nature of participation and interaction by researcher and participants is contexualized and contested given complex dynamics of power that shape all aspects of this doctoral study process. The critical feminist lens with its focus on reflexivity informed the content and process of knowledge production in this study and shaped key turning points: the ways in which this policy study was conceptualized, the choice of comparative life history methodology, ethical considerations, data collection and analysis and representation of findings. Life history is unlikely to be the methodology that first comes to mind when undertaking a policy study. Its historical roots are associated with biographical, oral history and narrative approaches, which typically aim to elicit understanding of lived experience. Yet, it was this very aspect, this focus on lived experience, which rendered life history methodology fitting as I contemplated how to examine the relationship between nurses and policy. I was interested in understanding nurses' political practice, how policy influenced nurses' capacity to advocate in their everyday lives, as well as nurses' impacts on policy processes and their larger social worlds.
机译:比较生活史政策研究的性别,性别和参与性维度在本文中,我探讨了女权主义的批判镜头如何在创建使用定性设计和比较生活史方法论的参与性政策研究中发挥关键作用。这项研究的重点是与倡导女同性恋健康有关的加拿大护士的政治实践。研究结果表明,性别视角和生活史方法的结合提供了以促进健康和解放成果的方式创造知识的潜力。然而,研究人员和参与者的参与和互动的本质是复杂而复杂的,因为复杂的动力构成了该博士研究过程的方方面面。注重反射性的女权主义批评者为这项研究提供了知识生产的内容和过程,并塑造了关键的转折点:本政策研究的概念化方式,比较生活史方法论的选择,道德考量,数据收集和分析和结果表示。生活史不太可能是进行政策研究时首先想到的方法。它的历史根源与传记,口述历史和叙事方法有关,这些方法通常旨在引起人们对生活经验的理解。然而,正是这一方面,对生活经验的关注,使生活史方法论变得很合适,因为我考虑了如何检查护士与保单之间的关系。我对了解护士的政治实践,政策如何影响护士在日常生活中进行倡导的能力以及护士对政策过程及其更大的社会世界的影响感兴趣。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号