首页> 外文期刊>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions: Official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions >A randomized two-by-two comparison of high-dose bolus tirofiban versus abciximab and unfractionated heparin versus bivalirudin during percutaneous coronary revascularization and stent placement: the tirofiban evaluation of novel dosing versus abciximab with clopidogrel and inhibition of thrombin (TENACITY) study trial.
【24h】

A randomized two-by-two comparison of high-dose bolus tirofiban versus abciximab and unfractionated heparin versus bivalirudin during percutaneous coronary revascularization and stent placement: the tirofiban evaluation of novel dosing versus abciximab with clopidogrel and inhibition of thrombin (TENACITY) study trial.

机译:在经皮冠状动脉血运重建和支架置入过程中高剂量大剂量替罗非班与阿昔单抗和普通肝素对比伐卢定的随机对照研究(2比2):替罗非班对新型剂量与阿昔单抗联合氯吡格雷和凝血酶抑制的替罗非班评估(TENACITY)研究试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: In the absence of high-dose thienopyridines, placebo-controlled trials have demonstrated a reduction in ischemic events with intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). One head-to-head trial comparing abciximab and tirofiban among PCI patients found tirofiban to be inferior, and laboratory evidence confirmed that the bolus dose of tirofiban tested in that trial to be less effective than abciximab. Whether a higher bolus dose of tirofiban would be as efficacious as abciximab during PCI is uncertain. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients undergoing PCI were randomized equally to abciximab or to tirofiban, given as high-dose bolus (25 mug/kg) plus 12-hr infusion (0.15 mug/kg/min). All patients received aspirin and clopidogrel and were additionally randomized to unfractionated heparin or bivalirudin. Approximately 8,000 patients were to be studied, but after 383 were enrolled, the study sponsor discontinued the trial for financial reasons. The primary endpoint of 30-day death, myocardial infarction, or urgent target vessel revascularization occurred in 8.8% of patients randomized to abciximab and 6.9% of those randomized to tirofiban. The respective rates of major bleeding were 1.5 and 1.6%. Additionally, the primary endpoint occurred in 8.1% of patients randomized to unfractionated heparin and 7.6% of those randomized to bivalirudin. The respective rates of major bleeding were 2.5% and 0.5%. CONCLUSION: With limited assessment, this direct comparison of high-dose bolus tirofiban versus abciximab produced encouraging results and suggests that further study of this tirofiban dose regimen is warranted. The limited assessments comparing heparin and bivalirudin are consistent with prior observations.
机译:背景:在不存在大剂量噻吩并吡啶类药物的情况下,安慰剂对照试验表明,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)期间,静脉使用糖蛋白IIb / IIIa拮抗剂可减少缺血事件。一项在PCI患者中比较abciximab和tirofiban的头对头试验发现,tirofiban的疗效较差,并且实验室证据证实,该试验中测试的tirofiban推注剂量的疗效不如abciximab。尚不确定在PCI期间更高剂量的替罗非班推注剂量是否与阿昔单抗一样有效。方法和结果:PCI患者被随机分为阿昔单抗或替罗非班,分别为大剂量推注(25杯/千克)加12小时输注(0.15杯/千克/分钟)。所有患者均接受阿司匹林和氯吡格雷治疗,并随机分为普通肝素或比伐卢定。大约要研究8,000名患者,但在383名患者入选后,研究资助人出于经济原因终止了该试验。 30天死亡,心肌梗塞或紧急目标血管血运重建的主要终点发生在8.8%随机分配给阿昔单抗的患者和6.9%随机分配给替罗非班的患者中。大出血的发生率分别为1.5%和1.6%。此外,主要终点发生在随机分配为普通肝素的患者中的占8.1%,随机分配比伐卢定的患者中占7.6%。大出血的发生率分别为2.5%和0.5%。结论:在有限的评估下,高剂量替罗非班与阿昔单抗的直接比较产生了令人鼓舞的结果,并建议对这种替罗非班剂量方案进行进一步研究。比较肝素和比伐卢定的有限评估与先前的观察一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号