...
首页> 外文期刊>Nuclear Medicine Communications >Diagnosis of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: Comparison of ventilation/perfusion scanning and multidetector computed tomography pulmonary angiography with pulmonary angiography
【24h】

Diagnosis of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: Comparison of ventilation/perfusion scanning and multidetector computed tomography pulmonary angiography with pulmonary angiography

机译:慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压的诊断:通气/灌注扫描与多探测器计算机断层扫描肺血管造影与肺血管造影的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The correct and prompt diagnosis of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) plays a pivotal role in determining appropriate therapy. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic efficacy of pulmonary ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) scanning and computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) using pulmonary angiography as the golden standard. METHODS: A total of 114 consecutive patients (49 men and 65 women, age 43.3±15.3 years) suspected of having CTEPH were prospectively enrolled. All patients underwent V/Q scanning, CTPA, and pulmonary angiography within an interval of 7 days from one another. Interpretation of V/Q images was based on the refined Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis criteria. For threshold 1, high-probability and intermediate-probability V/Q scan findings were considered to be positive, and low-probabilityormal V/Q scan findings were negative. For threshold 2, only a high-probability V/Q scan finding was considered to be positive, and intermediate-probability and low-probabilityormal V/Q scan findings were considered to be negative. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients (44.7%) had a final diagnosis of CTEPH. V/Q scan showed high probability, intermediate probability, and low probabilityormal scan in 52, three, and 59 patients, respectively. CTPA revealed 50 patients with CTEPH and 64 patients without CTEPH. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the V/Q scan were 100, 93.7, and 96.5%, respectively, with threshold 1, and 96.1, 95.2, and 95.6%, respectively, with threshold 2; similarly, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CTPA were 92.2, 95.2, and 93.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, both V/Q scanning and CTPA are accurate methods for the detection of CTEPH with excellent diagnostic efficacy.
机译:目的:正确,及时地诊断慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压(CTEPH)在确定适当的治疗方法中起着关键作用。这项研究旨在比较以肺血管造影为黄金标准的肺通气/灌注(V / Q)扫描和计算机断层扫描肺血管造影(CTPA)的诊断功效。方法:前瞻性纳入了114例连续的怀疑患有CTEPH的患者(男49例,女65例,年龄43.3±15.3岁)。所有患者彼此间隔7天进行V / Q扫描,CTPA和肺动脉造影。 V / Q图像的解释基于完善的肺栓塞诊断标准。对于阈值1,高概率和中等概率V / Q扫描结果被认为是阳性,而低概率/正常V / Q扫描结果被认为是阴性。对于阈值2,仅将高概率V / Q扫描结果视为阳性,而将中等概率和低概率/正常V / Q扫描结果视为阴性。结果:51名患者(44.7%)最终诊断为CTEPH。 V / Q扫描分别在52例,3例和59例患者中显示高概率,中概率和低概率/正常扫描。 CTPA显示50例有CTEPH的患者和64例没有CTEPH的患者。 V / Q扫描的灵敏度,特异性和准确度分别为阈值1、100、93.7和96.5%,阈值2分别为96.1、95.2和95.6%。同样,CTPA的敏感性,特异性和准确性分别为92.2%,95.2和93.9%。结论:总之,V / Q扫描和CTPA都是检测CTEPH的准确方法,具有出色的诊断功效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号