...
首页> 外文期刊>Neuropsychology >Is Radical-by-Radical Reading Strategy Effective for Chinese Pure Alexia? A Case Study
【24h】

Is Radical-by-Radical Reading Strategy Effective for Chinese Pure Alexia? A Case Study

机译:激进阅读策略对中国纯Alexia有效吗?案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: Currently, it is unclear whether a radical-by-radical (RBR) reading strategy exists in Chinese pure alexia, compared to the letter-by-letter (LBL) reading strategy in alphabetic languages. In this study, we focus on exploring the reading features of a Chinese pure alexic patient during the process of language recovery. Method: We investigated this issue using a series of neuropsychological tests at 4 days, 11 days, and 8 months after admission of a Chinese pure alexic patient. Results: The results showed that most words could not be read aloud initially by the patient. One week later, 2 clinical features were noted: RBR reading strategy and integration impairment. Finally, there were statistically significant differences in the reaction time between the single characters and compound characters, which indicated that a radical number effect may exist. Conclusion: Combined with the results of previous studies, the current case study indicates that there is evidence suggesting that the RBR reading strategy in Chinese pure alexia is of limited benefit, a result that appears fundamentally different from the LBL reading strategy.
机译:目的:目前尚不清楚与纯英文字母的字母逐字母(LBL)阅读策略相比,纯净的中文低氧患者是否存在激进的(RBR)阅读策略。在这项研究中,我们重点探讨语言恢复过程中一名中国纯文字患者的阅读特征。方法:我们在入院后的第4天,第11天和第8个月使用一系列神经心理学测试调查了此问题。结果:结果表明,患者最初无法大声朗读大多数单词。一周后,注意到2个临床特征:RBR阅读策略和整合障碍。最后,在单个字符和复合字符之间的反应时间上存在统计学上的显着差异,这表明可能存在自由基数效应。结论:结合先前的研究结果,当前的案例研究表明,有证据表明,中国纯性贫血中的RBR阅读策略获益有限,这一结果与LBL阅读策略存在根本差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号