...
首页> 外文期刊>Neurology India. >Utility of neurophysiological criteria in Guillain Barre syndrome: subtype spectrum from a tertiary referral hospital in India.
【24h】

Utility of neurophysiological criteria in Guillain Barre syndrome: subtype spectrum from a tertiary referral hospital in India.

机译:神经病理学标准在格林巴利综合征中的应用:来自印度三级转诊医院的亚型谱。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The Guillain Barre' syndrome (GBS) is a heterogeneous disease with various subtypes, the prevalence of which would depend on the geographic region. Recognition of these subtypes is of clinical importance since each subtype has an independent pathogenesis and different type of pathology and prognosis. OBJECTIVES: To study the various subtypes of GBS using the various published electrophysiological criteria. DESIGN: Retrospective descriptive study. Materials and Methods: In a tertiary care hospital setting, the study compared the various published criteria for demyelination in GBS. The charts of 115 consecutive patients referred for electrodiagnostic evaluation to the Electromyography laboratory between July 2000 and June 2006 were reviewed. RESULTS: Of the 115 patients, 51 (44.4%) patients had axonal forms of GBS and 44 (38.2%) patients had acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (AIDP). Applying the various published criteria, the number of patients categorized under the AIDP subtype ranged between 23.4% and 67.2%. CONCLUSION: In this study 44% patients had axonal forms of the disease, 38.2% patients had AIDP subtype and 17% remained unclassified. The most sensitive criteria to identify AIDP were the criteria proposed by Albers and colleagues and the Dutch group.
机译:背景:格林巴利综合征(GBS)是一种具有多种亚型的异质性疾病,其患病率取决于地理区域。这些亚型的识别具有临床重要性,因为每种亚型都有独立的发病机制以及不同类型的病理和预后。目的:使用已发表的各种电生理标准研究GBS的各种亚型。设计:回顾性描述性研究。材料和方法:在三级医院中,该研究比较了GBS中脱髓鞘的各种公开标准。回顾了2000年7月至2006年6月间连续115位转诊至肌电图实验室进行电诊断的患者的病历表。结果:115例患者中,51例(44.4%)患者具有轴突形式的GBS,44例(38.2%)患者患有急性炎性脱髓鞘性多发性神经根神经病(AIDP)。应用各种公开的标准,按AIDP亚型分类的患者数量在23.4%至67.2%之间。结论:在这项研究中,有44%的患者患有轴突病,有38.2%的患者患有AIDP亚型,还有17%的患者仍未分类。识别AIDP的最敏感标准是Albers及其同事和荷兰小组提出的标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号