首页> 外文期刊>Biological invasions >Far from home: responses of an American predator species to an American prey species in a jointly invaded area of Australia
【24h】

Far from home: responses of an American predator species to an American prey species in a jointly invaded area of Australia

机译:远离家乡:在澳大利亚共同入侵的地区,一种美国捕食者物种对一种美国猎物物种的反应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Far from their native ranges in the Americas, two invasive species come into contact in Australian waterbodies. Cane toads (Rhinella marina) fatally poison many anurophagous predators, whereas eastern mosquito fish (Gambusia holbrooki) voraciously consume anuran larvae. As cane toads spread south along Australia's east coast, they are colonizing areas where mosquito fish are abundant. What happens when these two American invaders encounter each other in Australia? We tested the responses to toad tadpoles of mosquito fish from populations that were sympatric versus allopatric with cane toads. Toad-sympatric fish generally ignored toad tadpoles. Toad-allopatric fish initially consumed a few tadpoles, but rapidly developed an aversion to these toxic prey items. The laboratory-reared progeny of toad-allopatric fishes were more likely to approach toad tadpoles than were the offspring of toad-sympatric fishes, but the two groups learned toad-avoidance at similar rates. Thus, mosquito fish show an innate aversion to cane toad tadpoles (perhaps reflecting coevolution with North American bufonid taxa), as well as an ability to rapidly learn taste-aversion. Our comparisons among populations suggest that several decades of toad-free existence in Australia caused a decline in the fishes' innate (heritable) aversion to toads, but did not affect the fishes' capacity to learn toad-avoidance after an initial exposure. Any impact of mosquito fish on cane toads thus is likely to be transitory. The rapid (<100-year) time frame of these shifts (the initial weakening of the fishes' response during toad-allopatry, and its recovery after secondary contact) emphasizes the dynamic nature of faunal responses during biological invasions, and the interplay between adaptation and phenotypic plasticity.
机译:远非美洲的本土范围,两种入侵物种已在澳大利亚水体中接触。蟾蜍蟾蜍(Rhinella marina)致命地毒害了许多嗜食性食肉动物,而东部蚊子鱼类(Gambusia holbrooki)则大量消耗无食性幼虫。随着甘蔗蟾蜍在澳大利亚东海岸向南扩散,它们成为了殖民地,那里的蚊子鱼很多。当这两个美国入侵者在澳大利亚相遇时会发生什么?我们测试了同胞对异特异的甘蔗蟾蜍种群对蚊fish蟾蜍t的反应。蟾蜍ym鱼通常忽略了蟾蜍t。蟾蜍异相鱼类最初食用了一些t,但很快就对这些有毒的猎物产生了反感。与蟾蜍同养鱼类的后代相比,实验室饲养的蟾蜍异养鱼类的后代更可能接近蟾蜍t,但两组人以相似的比率学会了避免蟾蜍。因此,蚊子鱼对甘蔗蟾蜍show表现出一种先天的厌恶感(也许反映出它与北美bufonid类群的共同进化),以及一种快速学习厌恶味的能力。我们在种群之间的比较表明,澳大利亚几十年来无蟾蜍的存在导致鱼类对蟾蜍的先天(遗传)厌恶性下降,但并未影响鱼类在初次接触后学会避免蟾蜍的能力。因此,蚊子对甘蔗蟾蜍的任何影响都可能是短暂的。这些变化的快速(<100年)时间框架(蟾蜍变色过程中鱼类的反应最初减弱,并且在二次接触后恢复)强调了生物入侵过程中动物反应的动态性质,以及适应之间的相互作用和表型可塑性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号