首页> 外文期刊>Cancer radiotherapie: journal de la Soci閠?fran鏰ise de radiotherapie oncologique >Hypofractionation and radiotherapy: 'L'éternel retour' [Hypofractionnement en radiothérapie: L'éternel retour]
【24h】

Hypofractionation and radiotherapy: 'L'éternel retour' [Hypofractionnement en radiothérapie: L'éternel retour]

机译:超分割和放疗:“永恒的回报” [放疗的超分割:永恒的回报]

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Hypofractionation is not a new idea in radiotherapy. The use of a few high-dose fractions has been proposed by some pioneers of our specialty in the early years of the 20th century. Hypofractionation then reappeared several times in the next decades, based on successive radiobiological concepts, a number of them having been shown to be wrong. The nominal single dose (NSD), for example, so fashionable in the 1970's, dramatically underestimated the late toxicity of the high-dose fractions. Consequently, the NSD was directly responsible for a significant increase of the incidence and of the severity of late complications in large cohorts of patients. The linear-quadratic model (LQ) unequivocally improved our understanding of fractionation sensitivity, but one has to keep in mind its limitations, both in the areas of low and high doses per fraction. For more than a decade, prostate cancer has been the subject of fierce discussions about its sensitivity to fractionation. A number of studies have suggested an unusually low (for a malignant tumor) alpha/beta ratio. However, the available data do not allow a precise evaluation of this ratio; "very low" (1.5 Gy), with an advantage of hypofractionation in terms of local control? Or simply "low" (3-4 Gy), only allowing a reduction of the total number of fractions (with a dose adequately reduced)? While waiting for complementary data, it is advised to remain very careful when modifying the classical schemes towards hypofractionation.
机译:超分割术不是放射治疗的新想法。在20世纪初期,我们专业的一些先驱提出了一些高剂量级分的用法。在随后的几十年中,基于连续的放射生物学概念,超分割术再次出现了几次,其中许多被证明是错误的。例如,在1970年代如此流行的标称单剂量(NSD)大大低估了高剂量部分的后期毒性。因此,NSD直接导致大量患者中晚期并发症的发生率和严重性的显着增加。线性二次模型(LQ)毫无疑问地改善了我们对分馏敏感性的理解,但必须记住其局限性,无论是在小剂量还是大剂量方面。十多年来,前列腺癌一直是关于其对分馏敏感性的激烈讨论的主题。大量研究表明,对于恶性肿瘤,α/β比值异常低。但是,现有数据无法对该比率进行精确评估。 “非常低”(1.5 Gy),就局部控制而言具有超分割的优势?还是简单地“低”(3-4 Gy),仅允许减少总分数(剂量已充分减少)?在等待补充数据时,建议在修改传统的分割方案时要非常小心。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号