...
首页> 外文期刊>Mutation Research: International Journal on Mutagenesis, Chromosome Breakage and Related Subjects >Analytical methods in bioassay-directed investigations of mutagenicity of air particulate material.
【24h】

Analytical methods in bioassay-directed investigations of mutagenicity of air particulate material.

机译:生物测定指导研究中空气微粒物质诱变性的分析方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The combination of short-term bioassays and analytical chemical techniques has been successfully used in the identification of a variety of mutagenic compounds in complex mixtures. Much of the early work in the field of bioassay-directed fractionation resulted from the development of a short-term bacterial assay employing Salmonella typhimurium; this assay is commonly known as the Ames assay. Ideally, analytical methods for assessment of mutagenicity of any environmental matrix should exhibit characteristics including high capacity, good selectivity, good analytical resolution, non-destructiveness, and reproducibility. A variety of extraction solvents have been employed in investigations of mutagenicity of air particulate; sequential combination of dichloromethane followed by methanol is most popular. Soxhlet extraction has been the most common extraction method, followed by sonication. Attempts at initial fractionation using different extraction solvents have met with limited success and highlight theneed for fractionation schemes applicable to moderately polar and polar mutagenic compounds. Fractionation methods reported in the literature are reviewed according to three general schemas: (i) acid/baseeutral partitioning followed by fractionation using open-column chromatography and/or HPLC; (ii) fractionation based on normal-phase (NP) HPLC using a cyanopropyl or chemically similar stationary phase; and (iii) fractionation by open-column chromatography followed by NP-HPLC. The HPLC methods may be preparative, semi-preparative, or analytical scale. Variations based on acid/baseeutral partitioning followed by a chromatographic separation have also been employed. Other lesser-used approaches involve fractionation based on ion-exchange and thin-layer chromatographies. Although some of the methodologies used in contemporary studies of mutagenicity of air particulate do not represent significant advances in technology over the past 30 years, their simplicity, low cost, effectiveness, and robustness combine to result in their continued application in modern laboratories.
机译:短期生物测定和分析化学技术的结合已成功用于鉴定复杂混合物中的多种诱变化合物。生物测定指导分离领域的许多早期工作是由于使用鼠伤寒沙门氏菌的短期细菌测定法的发展而产生的。这种测定法通常称为Ames测定法。理想地,用于评估任何环境基质的致突变性的分析方法应表现出以下特性:高容量,良好的选择性,良好的分析分辨率,无损和可再现性。在研究空气颗粒的致突变性时,已经使用了多种萃取溶剂。二氯甲烷与甲醇依次相继结合是最受欢迎的方法。索氏提取法是最常见的提取方法,其次是超声处理。使用不同的萃取溶剂进行初始分馏的尝试取得了有限的成功,并突出显示了适用于中等极性和极性诱变化合物的分馏方案的需求。文献报道的分馏方法根据三种通用方案进行了综述:(i)酸/碱/中性分配,然后使用开柱色谱和/或HPLC进行分馏; (ii)使用氰基丙基或化学相似的固定相,基于正相(NP)HPLC进行分级分离; (iii)通过开柱色谱,然后进行NP-HPLC分级分离。 HPLC方法可以是制备,半制备或分析规模的。基于酸/碱/中性分配,然后进行色谱分离的变化也已被采用。其他较少使用的方法涉及基于离子交换和薄层色谱的分级分离。尽管在过去的30年中,当代研究空气微粒致突变性的一些方法并不能代表技术的重大进步,但它们的简单性,低成本,有效性和耐用性相结合,导致它们继续在现代实验室中得到应用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号