首页> 外文期刊>Microbial Ecology: An International Journal >Comparison of Whole-Cell Fatty Acid (MIDI) or Phospholipid Fatty Acid (PLFA) Extractants as Biomarkers to Profile Soil Microbial Communities
【24h】

Comparison of Whole-Cell Fatty Acid (MIDI) or Phospholipid Fatty Acid (PLFA) Extractants as Biomarkers to Profile Soil Microbial Communities

机译:全细胞脂肪酸(MIDI)或磷脂脂肪酸(PLFA)萃取剂作为生物标记物对土壤微生物群落进行分析的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The whole-cell lipid extraction to profile microbial communities on soils using fatty acid (FA) biomarkers is commonly done with the two extractants associated with the phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) or Microbial IDentification Inc. (MIDI) methods. These extractants have very different chemistry and lipid separation procedures, but often shown a similar ability to discriminate soils from various management and vegetation systems. However, the mechanism and the chemistry of the exact suite of FAs extracted by these two methods are poorly understood. Therefore, the objective was to qualitatively and quantitatively compare the MIDI and PLFA microbial profiling methods for detecting microbial community shifts due to soil type or management. Twenty-nine soil samples were collected from a wide range of soil types across Oregon and extracted FAs by each method were analyzed by gas chromatography (GC) and GC-mass spectrometry. Unlike PLFA profiles, which were highly related to microbial FAs, the overall MIDI-FA profiles were highly related to the plant-derived FAs. Plant-associated compounds were quantitatively related to particulate organic matter (POM) and qualitatively related to the standing vegetation at sampling. These FAs were negatively correlated to respiration rate normalized to POM (Resp(POM)), which increased in systems under more intensive management. A strong negative correlation was found between MIDI-FA to PLFA ratios and total organic carbon (TOC). When the reagents used in MIDI procedure were tested for the limited recovery of MIDI-FAs from soil with high organic matter, the recovery of MIDI-FA microbial signatures sharply decreased with increasing ratios of soil to extractant. Hence, the MIDI method should be used with great caution for interpreting changes in FA profiles due to shifts in microbial communities.
机译:通常使用两种与磷脂脂肪酸(PLFA)或Microbial IDentification Inc.(MIDI)方法相关的提取剂完成全细胞脂质提取,以利用脂肪酸(FA)生物标记物对土壤中的微生物群落进行分析。这些萃取剂具有非常不同的化学和脂质分离程序,但通常表现出相似的区分土壤与各种管理和植被系统的能力。但是,人们对通过这两种方法提取的确切FA的机理和化学知之甚少。因此,目的是定性和定量地比较MIDI和PLFA微生物谱分析方法,以检测由于土壤类型或管理而引起的微生物群落变化。从俄勒冈州的各种土壤中收集了29个土壤样品,并通过气相色谱(GC)和GC-质谱法分析了每种方法提取的FA。与与微生物FAs高度相关的PLFA配置文件不同,整个MIDI-FA配置文件与源自植物的FAs高度相关。与植物相关的化合物在数量上与颗粒有机物(POM)定量相关,在质量上与采样时的站立植被相关。这些FA与归一化为POM(Resp(POM))的呼吸速率呈负相关,在更密集的管理下,呼吸速率增加。在MIDI-FA与PLFA的比例与总有机碳(TOC)之间发现强烈的负相关。当测试MIDI程序中使用的试剂从高有机质土壤中有限回收MIDI-FA时,随着土壤与萃取剂比例的增加,MIDI-FA微生物特征的回收率急剧下降。因此,应谨慎使用MIDI方法来解释由于微生物群落的变化而导致的FA曲线的变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号