Review of rope-based access methods for the forest canopy: safe and unsafe practices in published information sources and a summary of current methods

Anderson David L.; Koomjian Will; French Brian; Altenhoff Scott R.; Luce James

首页> 外文期刊>Methods in Ecology and Evolution >Review of rope-based access methods for the forest canopy: safe and unsafe practices in published information sources and a summary of current methods

【24h】

Review of rope-based access methods for the forest canopy: safe and unsafe practices in published information sources and a summary of current methods

机译：审查基于绳索的林冠遮盖方法：已发布信息源中的安全和不安全做法以及当前方法的摘要

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

1. The availability of reliable information on tree climbing methods is critical for the development of canopy science and for the safety of workers accessing the forest canopy.

机译：1.关于攀树方法的可靠信息的提供对于树冠科学的发展和进入森林树冠的工人的安全至关重要。

著录项

来源
《Methods in Ecology and Evolution》 |2015年第8期|共8页
作者
Anderson David L.; Koomjian Will; French Brian; Altenhoff Scott R.; Luce James;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类生物科学;
关键词
ANSI Z133.1; best practices; forest canopy access; safety; tree climbing;

机译：ANSI Z133.1;最佳实践;林冠进入;安全性;爬树;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Review of rope-based access methods for the forest canopy: safe and unsafe practices in published information sources and a summary of current methods [J] . Anderson David L., Koomjian Will, French Brian, Methods in Ecology and Evolution . 2015,第8期

机译：审查基于绳索的林冠遮盖方法：已发布信息源中的安全和不安全做法以及当前方法的摘要
2. Mixed method integrative review exploring nurses' recognition and response to unsafe practice [J] . Blair Wendy, Kable Ashley, Courtney-Pratt Helen, Journal of advanced nursing . 2016,第3期

机译：混合方法综合评估，探索护士对不安全行为的认可和应对
3. Mixed method integrative review exploring nurses' recognition and response to unsafe practice [J] . Blair Wendy, Kable Ashley, Courtney-Pratt Helen, Journal of advanced nursing . 2016,第3期

机译：混合方法综合评论探索护士的认可和对不安全实践的回应
4. ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS IN JAPAN: A REVIEW OF PUBLISHED STUDIES, METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES AND PRACTICE [C] . Nixon J, Pang F 5th International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Vol.3, Nov 27-Dec 1, 2000, Osaka, Japan . 2000

机译：日本的经济评价：发表的研究，方法论的问题和实践的回顾
5. Analysis of the Methodological Quality of Published Prosthodontic-related Systematic Reviews and their Impact on Clinical Practice, Research and Teaching According to the Correspondent Authors. [D] . Aziz, Tehnia. 2012

机译：据通讯作者分析，已发表的修复相关系统评价的方法学质量及其对临床实践，研究和教学的影响。
6. Sources of unsafe primary care for older adults: a mixed-methods analysis of patient safety incident reports [O] . Alison Cooper, Adrian Edwards, Huw Williams, -1

机译：老年人不安全的初级保健来源：患者安全事故报告的混合方法分析
7. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: summary article A report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on practice guidelines (committee to update the 1997 exercise testing guidelines) 11The ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines makes every effort to avoid any actual or potential conflicts of interest that might arise as a result of an outside relationship or personal interest of a member of the writing panel. Specifically, all members of the writing panel are asked to provide disclosure statements of all such relationships that might be perceived as real or potential conflicts of interest. These statements are reviewed by the parent task force, reported orally to all members of the writing panel at the first meeting, and updated as changes occur.22This document was approved by the American College of Cardiology Foundation Board of Trustees in July 2002 and by the American Heart Association Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee in June 2002. When citing this document, the American College of Cardiology Foundation and the American Heart Association would appreciate the following citation format: Gibbons RJ, Balady GJ, Bricker JT, Chaitman BR, Fletcher GF, Froelicher VF, Mark DB, McCallister BD, Mooss AN, O’Reilly MG, Winters WL Jr. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: summary article: a report of the ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1997 Exercise Testing Guidelines). J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:1531–40.33Copies: This document is available on the World Wide Web sites of the ACC (www.acc.org) and the AHA (www.americanheart.org). A single copy of the complete guidelines is available by calling 800-253-4636 (US only) or writing the American College of Cardiology, Resource Center, 9111 Old Georgetown Road, Bethesda, MD 20814-1699. Ask for reprint No. 71-0231. To obtain a copy of the Executive Summary published in the October 1, 2002 issue of Circulation, ask for reprint No. 71-0232. To purchase additional reprints (specify version and reprint number): up to 999 copies, call 800-611-6083 (US only) or fax 413-665-2671; 1000 or more copies, call 410-528-4426, fax 410-528-4264, or e-mail kbradle@lww.com.44(J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:1531–40.)55©2002 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation and the American Heart Association, Inc. [O] . Gibbons Raymond J, Balady Gary J, Timothy Bricker J, 2002

机译：ACC / AHA 2002年运动测试指南更新：摘要文章美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组的报告（委员会对1997年运动测试指南进行了更新）11ACC / AHA实践指南工作组使每一个努力避免由于写作小组成员的外部关系或个人利益而引起的任何实际或潜在的利益冲突。具体来说，要求写作小组的所有成员提供所有可能被视为实际或潜在利益冲突的关系的披露声明。这些声明由上级工作组进行审查，在第一次会议上向书面小组的所有成员口头报告，并在发生变化时进行更新。22本文件于2002年7月获得美国心脏病学会基金会理事会的批准。美国心脏协会科学咨询和协调委员会于2002年6月提出。引用该文件时，美国心脏病学会基金会和美国心脏协会将赞赏以下引用格式：Gibbons RJ，Balady GJ，Bricker JT，Chaitman BR，Fletcher GF， Froelicher VF，Mark DB，McCalister BD，Mooss AN，O'Reilly MG，Winters WL Jr.ACC / AHA 2002锻炼测试指南更新：摘要文章：ACC / AHA实践指南工作组的报告（更新委员会）（1997年运动测试指南）。 J Am Coll Cardiol 2002； 40：1531–40.33副本：该文档可在ACC（www.acc.org）和AHA（www.americanheart.org）的万维网站点上找到。可以通过致电800-253-4636（仅限美国）或写信给美国心脏病学会资源中心（位于贝塞斯达，乔治市老街9111号，马里兰州20814-1699）来获得完整指南的单个副本。要求转载第71-0231号。要获得发表在2002年10月1日的《发行》上的《执行摘要》，请索阅第71-0232号。要购买其他重印本（指定版本和重印本号码）：最多999份，请致电800-611-6083（仅限美国）或传真413-665-2671；否则，请重新发送。 1000份或更多，请致电410-528-4426，传真410-528-4264或电子邮件kbradle@lww.com.44（美国运筹学杂志，2002； 40：1531–40。）55©2002心脏病学基金会基金会和美国心脏协会有限公司
8. Ecological Risk Assessment Methods: A Review and Evaluation of Past Practices in the Superfund and RCRA (Resource Conservation and Recovery Act) Programs (Executive Summary Included) [R] . Zamuda, C. 1989

机译：生态风险评估方法：对超级基金和RCRa（资源保护和恢复法案）计划中过去实践的审查和评估（包括执行摘要）

Review of rope-based access methods for the forest canopy: safe and unsafe practices in published information sources and a summary of current methods

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅