首页> 外文期刊>Methods in Ecology and Evolution >Solving the pitfalls of pitfall trapping: a two-circle method for density estimation of ground-dwelling arthropods
【24h】

Solving the pitfalls of pitfall trapping: a two-circle method for density estimation of ground-dwelling arthropods

机译:解决陷阱陷阱的陷阱:用于地下节肢动物密度估计的两圆法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

1. Pitfall traps are widely used for investigating ground-dwelling arthropods, but have been heavily criticized due to their species-, habitat- and attractant-specific trapping radius which produces unreliable estimation of species diversity and density. 2. We developed a two-circle method (TCM) for simultaneously estimating densities of ground-dwelling arthropods and the effective trapping radius. Multiple pairs of traps are located different distances apart, and the intersection of trapping areas can be calculated using the inverse trigonometric function. The density and effective trapping radius can be estimated from a nonlinear regression of the change in the total number of individuals caught with the distance between the paired pitfall traps. 3. We compared the performance of TCM with the estimator based on the nested-cross array (NCA) for arranging pitfall traps, by comparing predicted densities from these two methods with the real density obtained from the suction sampling method (SSM). 4. Simulations with known arthropod densities and effective trapping radius suggested that TCM produced accurate density estimation, while NCA significantly underestimated the known density. Pitfall trapping of ground-dwelling arthropods on two habitats (crop field and desert steppe) confirmed this conclusion when comparing estimation from TCM and NCA with densities obtained from the SSM. 5. TCM is a promising technique for the density estimation of ground-dwelling arthropods, especially for traps with liquid attractant and areas with relatively homogenous habitat and away from habitat edges.
机译:1.陷阱陷阱被广泛用于调查地下节肢动物,但由于它们的物种,生境和引诱剂特定的捕获半径而产生了不可靠的物种多样性和密度估计,因此遭到了严厉批评。 2.我们开发了一种两圆法(TCM),用于同时估算地面节肢动物的密度和有效诱捕半径。多对陷阱的间隔距离不同,可以使用反三角函数来计算陷阱区域的交点。密度和有效捕集半径可以通过对成对陷阱陷阱之间的距离进行捕获的个体总数变化的非线性回归来估算。 3.通过比较两种方法的预测密度与吸取采样方法(SSM)获得的实际密度,我们比较了基于嵌套交叉阵列(NCA)的估计器与TCM的性能。 4.用已知的节肢动物密度和有效诱捕半径进行的模拟表明,TCM产生了准确的密度估算值,而NCA大大低估了已知的密度。将中药和中草药的估计值与由SSM获得的密度进行比较时,在两个生境(作物田和沙漠草原)上栖地节肢动物的陷阱陷阱证实了这一结论。 5.中药是用于估计陆栖节肢动物密度的一种有前途的技术,特别是对于带有液体引诱剂的诱集装置以及栖息地相对均匀且远离栖息地边缘的区域。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号