首页> 外文期刊>Medical education >Entering and navigating academic medicine: academic clinician-educators' experiences.
【24h】

Entering and navigating academic medicine: academic clinician-educators' experiences.

机译:进入和浏览学术医学:临床临床医生-教育工作者的经验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: Despite a recognised need for richer narratives about academic medicine, much of the literature is limited to an analysis of the enablers and barriers associated with recruitment and retention, and focuses on analysing the development of research career pathways. We explored academic clinician-educators' experiences of entering into and navigating academic medicine, with a particular focus on those who privilege teaching above research. METHODS: Data were collected through interviews and focus groups conducted across a medical school at one Australian university. We used socio-cognitive career theory to provide theoretical insight into the factors that influence academic clinician-educators' interests, choice and motivations regarding entering and pursuing a teaching pathway within academic medicine. Framework analysis was used to illustrate key themes in the data. RESULTS: We identified a number of themes related to academic clinician-educators' engagement and performance within an academic medicine career focused on teaching. These include contextual factors associated with how academic medicine is structured as a discipline, cultural perceptions regarding what constitutes legitimate practice in academia, experiential factors associated with the opportunity to develop a professional identity commensurate with being an educator, and socialisation practices. CONCLUSIONS: The emphasis on research in academia can engender feelings of marginalisation and lack of credibility for those clinicians who favour teaching over research. The prevailing focus on supporting and socialising clinicians in research will need to change substantially to facilitate the rise of the academic clinician-educator.
机译:目的:尽管公认需要对学术医学进行更丰富的叙述,但许多文献仅限于分析与招募和保留相关的促成因素和障碍,并且着重于分析研究职业道路的发展。我们探索了学术临床医生-教育者进入和浏览学术医学的经验,尤其关注那些优先从事研究工作的人。方法:数据是通过在澳大利亚一所大学的医学院内进行的访谈和焦点小组收集的。我们使用社会认知职业理论来提供有关影响学术临床医生-教育者的兴趣,选择以及进入和追求学术医学教学途径的动机的理论见解。框架分析用于说明数据中的关键主题。结果:我们确定了与临床医生-教育工作者在专注于教学的学术医学职业中的参与和表现有关的多个主题。这些因素包括与学术医学如何构成一门学科有关的背景因素,关于学术界合法实践构成的文化观念,与发展与教育者相称的专业身份的机会有关的经验因素以及社会化实践。结论:学术界对研究的重视可能会使那些偏爱教学而不是研究的临床医生产生边缘化的感觉,并缺乏可信度。在支持和社会化临床研究方面的主流重点将需要进行重大改变,以促进临床临床医生的兴起。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号