首页> 外文期刊>Medical education >Grounding policy development within an educational setting: an exploration.
【24h】

Grounding policy development within an educational setting: an exploration.

机译:在教育环境中扎根政策制定:探索。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To explore an approach for informing the development of regional policy by eliciting the considered views of GP participants at an educational event. In particular we discuss the reaction of GP participants to this approach. (In this instance our GP participants were trainers and the evolving policy under discussion was that of 'clinical governance'.) METHOD: An educational event was planned to facilitate discussion and the recording of the considered views of GP trainer participants. The acceptability of this approach to the participants was evaluated via observation and through feedback forms. RESULTS: While observation suggested that the participants were involved in many lively and constructive discussions, the feedback generated showed that many participants felt uncomfortable about the use of an educational event to inform development. DISCUSSION: We recognize the need to inform and facilitate change through the involvement of those who will be participants in the change process. The rapid timescales imposed by change and the 'burden' of additional research involvement on practitioners are issues. Approaches based on action research and participatory research principles may have potential and can throw light on the difficulties we experienced. CONCLUSION: We need to identify approaches which will allow us to ground development within the views of those to be affected by change. Our own attempt demonstrated difficulties. We would welcome further debate over methods and approaches applicable in this border territory between research, development and education.
机译:目的:探索一种方法,通过在教育活动中征求全科医生的参与意见,从而促进区域政策的发展。特别是,我们讨论了GP参与者对此方法的反应。 (在这种情况下,我们的GP参与者是培训师,正在讨论的不断发展的政策是“临床治理”。)方法:计划进行一次教育活动,以促进讨论和记录GP培训师参与者的观点。通过观察和反馈表评估了这种方法对参与者的可接受性。结果:虽然观察结果表明参与者参与了许多生动而富有建设性的讨论,但所产生的反馈表明,许多参与者对于使用教育活动来促进发展感到不自在。讨论:我们认识到需要通过将要参与变更过程的人员的参与来告知和促进变更。变化带来的快速时间表以及对从业人员进行额外研究的“负担”是个问题。基于行动研究和参与性研究原则的方法可能具有潜力,并且可以阐明我们所遇到的困难。结论:我们需要确定一些方法,这些方法将使我们能够在受变更影响的人们的观点基础上发展。我们自己的尝试表明了困难。我们欢迎就在研究,开发和教育之间的边界地区适用的方法和方法进行进一步的辩论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号