首页> 外文期刊>Medical decision making: An international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making >Economic evaluation of the DiAMOND randomized trial: cost and outcomes of 2 decision aids for mode of delivery among women with a previous cesarean section.
【24h】

Economic evaluation of the DiAMOND randomized trial: cost and outcomes of 2 decision aids for mode of delivery among women with a previous cesarean section.

机译:DiAMOND随机试验的经济评估:剖宫产前妇女分娩方式的两种决策辅助工具的成本和结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Maternal preferences should be considered in decisions about mode of delivery following a previous cesarean, but risks and benefits are unclear. Decision aids can help decision making, although few studies have assessed costs in conjunction with effectiveness. OBJECTIVE: Economic evaluation of 2 decision aids for women with 1 previous cesarean. DESIGN: Cost-consequences analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data sources were self-reported resource use and outcome and published national unit costs. The target population was women with 1 previous cesarean. The time horizon was 37 weeks' gestation and 6 weeks postnatal. The perspective was health care delivery system. The interventions were usual care, usual care plus an information program, and usual care plus a decision analysis program. The outcome measures were costs to the National Health Service (NHS) in the United Kingdom (UK), score on the Decisional Conflict Scale, and mode of delivery. RESULTS OF MAIN ANALYSIS: Cost of delivery represented 84% of the total cost; mode of delivery was the most important determinant of cost differences across the groups. Mean (SD) total cost per mother and baby: 2033 (677) for usual care, 2069 (738) for information program, and 2019 (741) for decision analysis program. Decision aids reduced decisional conflict. Women using the decision analysis program had fewest cesarean deliveries. RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS: Applying a cost premium to emergency cesareans over electives had little effect on group comparisons. Conclusions were unaffected. LIMITATIONS: Disparity in timing of outcomes and costs, data completeness, and quality. CONCLUSIONS: Decision aids can reduce decisional conflict in women with a previous cesarean section when deciding on mode of delivery. The information program could be implemented at no extra cost to the NHS. The decision analysis program might reduce the rate of cesarean sections without any increase in costs.
机译:背景:先前剖宫产后分娩方式的决定应考虑母亲的偏爱,但风险和收益尚不清楚。决策辅助工具可以帮助决策,尽管很少有研究评估成本和有效性。目的:对有1例剖宫产的女性进行2种决策辅助的经济评估。设计:成本后果分析。材料和方法:数据来源是自我报告的资源使用和结果以及已公布的国家单位成本。目标人群是有过一次剖腹产的女性。时间范围是妊娠37周和产后6周。观点是卫生保健提供系统。干预措施为常规护理,常规护理加信息程序,以及常规护理加决策分析程序。结果指标包括英国(UK)国家卫生服务(NHS)的费用,决策冲突量表的得分以及分娩方式。主要分析结果:交付成本占总成本的84%;交付方式是各组成本差异的最重要决定因素。每个母婴平均总费用(SD):常规护理为2033(677),信息计划为2069(738),决策分析计划为2019(741)。决策辅助减少了决策冲突。使用决策分析程序的妇女剖腹产最少。敏感性分析的结果:紧急剖腹产的费用溢价高于选修课,对小组比较的影响很小。结论不受影响。局限性:结果和成本,数据完整性和质量的时间差异。结论:在决定分娩方式时,决策辅助工具可以减少剖宫产前妇女的决策冲突。该信息计划可以在不增加NHS费用的情况下实施。决策分析程序可能会降低剖宫产率,而不会增加成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号