首页> 外文期刊>Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing: Journal of the International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering >Strength analysis of clavicle fracture fixation devices and fixation techniques using finite element analysis with musculoskeletal force input
【24h】

Strength analysis of clavicle fracture fixation devices and fixation techniques using finite element analysis with musculoskeletal force input

机译:锁骨骨折力固定装置的强度分​​析及采用骨骼肌力输入的有限元分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the cases, when clavicle fractures are treated with a fixation plate, opinions are divided about the best position of the plate, type of plate and type of screw units. Results from biomechanical studies of clavicle fixation devices are contradictory, probably partly because of simplified and varying load cases used in different studies. The anatomy of the shoulder region is complex, which makes it difficult and expensive to perform realistic experimental tests; hence, reliable simulation is an important complement to experimental tests. In this study, a method for finite element simulations of stresses in the clavicle plate and bone is used, in which muscle and ligament force data are imported from a multibody musculoskeletal model. The stress distribution in two different commercial plates, superior and anterior plating position and fixation including using a lag screw in the fracture gap or not, was compared. Looking at the clavicle fixation from a mechanical point of view, the results indicate that it is a major benefit to use a lag screw to fixate the fracture. The anterior plating position resulted in lower stresses in the plate, and the anatomically shaped plate is more stress resistant and stable than a regular reconstruction plate.
机译:在这种情况下,当用固定板治疗锁骨骨折时,关于板的最佳位置,板的类型和螺钉单元的类型的意见不一。锁骨固定装置的生物力学研究结果是相互矛盾的,可能部分是由于在不同研究中使用的负荷情况简单且变化。肩部区域的解剖结构很复杂,因此进行逼真的实验测试既困难又昂贵。因此,可靠的仿真是对实验测试的重要补充。在这项研究中,使用了一种在锁骨板和骨头中进行应力有限元模拟的方法,其中从多体肌肉骨骼模型中导入了肌肉和韧带力数据。比较了两种不同商业板的应力分布,即上,前板的位置以及是否在骨折间隙中使用方头螺钉进行固定。从机械角度看锁骨固定,结果表明使用方头螺钉固定骨折的主要好处。前板的位置导致板中的应力较低,并且解剖形状的板比常规的重建板更具抗应力性和稳定性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号