首页> 外文期刊>Fortschritt-Berichte VDI, Reihe 12. Verkehrstechnik-Fahrzeugtechnik >CO_2e-emissions of different technologies in passenger cars at real user scenarios in the product life cycle
【24h】

CO_2e-emissions of different technologies in passenger cars at real user scenarios in the product life cycle

机译:产品生命周期中实际用户场景下乘用车中不同技术的CO_2e排放

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Comprehensive objective evaluation of technologies can only be achieved under consideration of the entire product lifecycle. In the present work, the resulting CO_2-equivalent (CO_2e) emissions of different drivetrain technologies are compared and quantified over the total lifecycle, including internal combustion engines (ICE), hybrid- and electric drives. Furthermore, the evaluation considers various vehicle body technologies and materials (steel, aluminium and carbon-fibre-reinforced plastic CFRP), and the provision of electric energy and fuel from fossil and renewable origin. The use phase has a major influence on the life cycle evaluation of vehicles. In the present work, different customer usage scenarios are taken into account. Determination and processing of data is done by a combination of simulation and field tests. The study discusses resulting CO_2e emissions of production and use of the defined systems. Furthermore, it delivers an outlook on comprehensive future assessment strategies, which are able to consider individual user scenarios. In case of plug-in hybrids (PHEV) and electric vehicles with range extenders (REEV), the overall balance is significantly influenced by the ratio of electric- or fuel-supplied operation. A high share of short distances and intermediate charging possibilities supports an increased use of the electric drive unit. This leads to a lower CO_2e footprint, especially when using electric energy from renewable sources. A higher share of long distances without intermediate charging requires the increased use of the ICE. The CO_2e saving potential of material-lightweight construction depends also on the user scenario, especially on the share of acceleration and deceleration phases (urban traffic) of the total travel distance. Other main influences are efficiency of the drivetrain and effort for production. The saving potential of lightweight technologies increases with a higher portion of urban traffic, lower efforts for production and lower efficiency of the propulsion system.
机译:仅在考虑整个产品生命周期的情况下才能实现对技术的全面客观评估。在当前的工作中,比较并量化了整个传动系统(包括内燃机(ICE),混合动力和电驱动器)在不同生命周期内产生的不同动力总成的CO_2当量(CO_2e)。此外,评估还考虑了各种车身技术和材料(钢,铝和碳纤维增强塑料CFRP),以及从化石和可再生来源提供电能和燃料。使用阶段对车辆的生命周期评估有重大影响。在当前工作中,考虑了不同的客户使用场景。数据的确定和处理是通过模拟和现场测试相结合来完成的。该研究讨论了所产生的CO_2e排放量以及所定义系统的使用情况。此外,它还提供了对未来综合评估策略的展望,该策略能够考虑各个用户方案。对于插电式混合动力汽车(PHEV)和带增程器(REEV)的电动汽车,总体平衡会受到电动或燃油供应比例的很大影响。短距离和中间充电可能性的高份额支持了电驱动单元的更多使用。这导致较低的CO_2e占地面积,尤其是在使用可再生能源发电时。在不进行中间充电的情况下,更高的长途距离份额需要增加ICE的使用量。轻质建筑节省二氧化碳的潜力还取决于用户的情况,尤其取决于总行驶距离中加速和减速阶段(城市交通)的份额。其他主要影响因素是传动系统的效率和生产努力。随着城市交通量的增加,生产工作量的减少以及推进系统效率的降低,轻型技术的节能潜力也随之增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号