首页> 外文期刊>Marine Mammal Science >Cohort and tag-site-specific tag-loss rates in mark-recapture studies: A southern elephant seal cautionary case
【24h】

Cohort and tag-site-specific tag-loss rates in mark-recapture studies: A southern elephant seal cautionary case

机译:标记夺回研究中特定人群和标记现场的标记丢失率:南部象海豹警示案例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Marker-loss is a common feature of mark-recapture studies and important as it may bias parameter estimation. A slight alteration in tag-site of double tagged southern elephant seals (Mirounga leonina), marked at Marion Island from 1983 to 2005 in an ongoing mark-recapture program, had important consequences for tag-loss. We calculated age-specific tag-retention rates and cumulative tag-retention probabilities using a maximum likelihood model selection approach in the software application TAG_LOSS 3.2.0. Under the tag-loss independence assumption, double tag-loss of inner interdigital webbing tags (IIT; 17 cohorts) remained below 1% in the first 5 yr and increased monotonically as seals aged, with higher tag-loss in males. Lifetime cumulative IIT tag-loss was 11.9% for females and 18.4% for males, and equivalent for all cohorts. Changing the tag-site to the outer interdigital webbing (OIT; 6 cohorts) resulted in increased and cohort-dependent tag-loss, although the variation (mean pl 95% CI) in cumulative tag-loss probabilities never exceeded 5.3% between cohorts at similar age. Although different studies may homogenize techniques, we advocate the importance of data set-specific assessment of tag-loss rates to ensure greatest confidence in population parameters obtained from mark-recapture experiments. Permanent marking should be implemented where feasible.
机译:标记丢失是标记夺回研究的一个共同特征,并且很重要,因为它可能会影响参数估计。 1983年至2005年在进行中的商标回收计划中,在马里恩岛标记的带有双标签的南部象海豹(Mirounga leonina)的标签位略有改变,这对标签丢失产生了重要影响。我们使用软件应用程序TAG_LOSS 3.2.0中的最大似然模型选择方法,计算了针对特定年龄段的标签保留率和累积标签保留率。在标签丢失独立性假设下,内部叉指式织带标签(IIT; 17个队列)的双标签丢失在前5年保持在1%以下,并且随着海豹的衰老而单调增加,男性标签丢失更高。女性的终生累积IIT标签损失率为11.9%,男性为18.4%,所有人群均相等。将标签站点更改为外部叉指织带(OIT; 6个队列)会导致增加的且依赖于队列的标签丢失,尽管在30岁时,两个队列之间的累积标签丢失概率的变化(均值95%CI)从未超过5.3%相似的年龄。尽管不同的研究可能使技术同质化,但我们主张对数据集进行标签丢失率评估的重要性,以确保对从标记回收实验中获得的种群参数具有最大的信心。如果可行,应实施永久性标记。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号