首页> 外文期刊>Canadian Geotechnical Journal >Numerical simulations of a light nonaqueous phase liquid (LNAPL) movement in variably saturated soils with capillary hysteresis
【24h】

Numerical simulations of a light nonaqueous phase liquid (LNAPL) movement in variably saturated soils with capillary hysteresis

机译:具有毛细管滞后作用的可变饱和土壤中轻质非水相液体(LNAPL)运动的数值模拟

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The fate and transport of pollutants in the subsurface is usually predicted using numerical simulations. Comparisons of the simulation results with experimental data are required to validate the numerical codes. In this paper, the nonaqueous phase liquid (NAPL) simulator code was used to numerically simulate two centrifugal light nonaqueous phase liquid (LNAPL) transport experiments. The numerical predictions were compared with the centrifugal test results and the impact of capillary hysteresis was evaluated. It was concluded that the simulation with the nonhysteretic model slightly underestimated the LNAPL volume retained in the vadose zone, and the average error of the predicted LNAPL saturation in the vadose zone and along the plume centerline was approximately 5% to 10%. The application of capillary hysteresis for the numerical simulation of the second centrifuge test has eliminated this error. In addition, accounting for hysteresis in the numerical simulation of the second centrifuge test has considerably improved the predicted results with respect to the size of the lens-shaped plume within the capillary fringe. However, there were inconsistencies between the numerical and experimental results, especially with respect to the time for the LNAPL to reach the groundwater level. This was found to be due to overestimation of the simulated downward infiltration of the LNAPL in the capillary fringe. It was found that the pore-connectivity parameter with a value of 0.66 for the relative permeability-saturation model produced the best comparison with experimental results.
机译:通常使用数值模拟来预测地下污染物的命运和迁移。需要将仿真结果与实验数据进行比较,以验证数字代码。本文使用非水相液体(NAPL)模拟器代码对两个离心轻质非水相液体(LNAPL)传输实验进行了数值模拟。将数值预测结果与离心测试结果进行了比较,并评估了毛细管滞后的影响。结论是,使用非滞后模型进行的模拟略微低估了渗流带中保留的LNAPL体积,并且渗流带中和沿羽流中心线的预测LNAPL饱和度的平均误差约为5%至10%。毛细管滞后技术在第二次离心试验的数值模拟中的应用消除了该误差。另外,在第二次离心试验的数值模拟中考虑滞后现象,相对于毛细管边缘内的透镜状羽状物的尺寸,大大改善了预测结果。但是,数值和实验结果之间存在不一致,特别是在LNAPL达到地下水位的时间方面。发现这是由于过高估计了毛细管边缘中LNAPL的模拟向下渗透。结果表明,相对渗透率饱和模型的孔隙连通性参数值为0.66,与实验结果具有最佳的对比。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号