首页> 外文期刊>Marine Geology >Provenance of Holocene sediments in the outer part of the Paleo-Qiantang River estuary, China
【24h】

Provenance of Holocene sediments in the outer part of the Paleo-Qiantang River estuary, China

机译:中国古钱塘江口外全新世沉积物来源

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Core SE2 from the landward part of the modem Qiantang River (QR) estuary contains a 50 + m-thick succession of late Pleistocene to Holocene deposits that records the transgressive-regressive environmental transition from fluvial sedimentation, through a paleo-estuary phase and shallow-marine deposition, to the modern estuarine setting. Sand and silt samples from the Paleo-QR estuary phase were analyzed for heavy-mineral and geochemical compositions, as well as the U-Pb ages of detrital zircons, in order to investigate the source of the sediment during the Holocene. The Paleo-QR estuary sediments in core SE2, which accumulated between approximately 10,100 and 9500 cal yr B.P., contain a characteristic heavy-mineral assemblage of hematite-limonite, epidote, zircon, leucoxene and magnetite, consistent with derivation from the QR drainage basin. These data, as well as geochemical proxies including the fractionation patterns of trace and rare earth elements, and elemental ratios La/Sc and Th/Co, suggest that the Paleo-QR estuary sediments cannot be derived from the modern Changjiang River to the north, which is contributing to the infill of the present-day QR estuary. Two major zircon-grain age peaks (99-250 Ma and 740-1000 Ma) coincide with the main tectonic and magmatic events in the QR catchment, whereas the characteristic age peaks for the modern Changjiang River sediments (e.g. 200-400 Ma and 1800-2100 Ma) are absent. Because the portion of the Paleo-QR estuary sampled is interpreted to lie seaward of the contemporaneous bedload convergence, in the area experiencing flood-dominant, landward transport of sediment, the sand and silt are unlikely to have come directly from the QR. Instead, we infer that the sediments were derived from the offshore part of the QR incised valley by flood-tidal reworking and landward transport. During the Paleo-QR estuary period, the incised valleys of the QR and Changjiang River were separate from each other for a considerable distance offshore. Sediment supplied by the Changjiang River was trapped in its estuary such that there was no sediment exchange between the two systems as there is now. This case study indicates that the combination of sediment geochemistry, heavy-mineral composition, and zircon chronology can supply important constraints on sediment dispersal patterns, even in dynamic estuarine and coastal areas with complex sediment transport pathways. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:来自现代钱塘江(QR)河口陆段的SE2岩心包含50 + m厚的更新世晚期至全新世沉积,记录了从河流沉积到海河-古河相-浅海相的海侵-回归环境过渡。海洋沉积,到现代河口环境。为了研究全新世沉积物的来源,分析了古QR口相的沙和粉砂样品的重矿物和地球化学成分以及碎屑锆石的U-Pb年龄。 SE2岩心中的古QR口沉积物堆积在约10100到9500 cal B.P.年之间,其特征是赤铁矿-褐铁矿,露石,锆石,白二烯和磁铁矿的重矿物组合,与QR盆地的衍生相一致。这些数据以及包括痕量和稀土元素的分馏模式以及元素比La / Sc和Th / Co的地球化学代理数据表明,古QR口河口沉积物不能源自现代长江以北地区,这有助于当今QR口的充实。两个主要的锆石年龄年龄峰(99-250 Ma和740-1000 Ma)与QR流域的主要构造和岩浆事件相吻合,而现代长江沉积物的特征年龄峰(例如200-400 Ma和1800 -2100 Ma)缺席。由于采样的古QR河口部分被解释为处于同期河床汇聚的海面,因此在洪水占主导,沉积物向陆运的地区,沙土和泥沙不可能直接来自QR。取而代之的是,我们推断出这些沉积物是通过洪水潮汐再造和陆运从QR切割山谷的近海部分获得的。在古QR河口时期,QR和长江的切开河谷彼此分开很远的距离。长江供应的沉积物被困在河口中,因此两个系统之间没有像现在这样的沉积物交换。该案例研究表明,即使在动态河口和具有复杂泥沙输运途径的沿海地区,泥沙地球化学,重矿物成分和锆石年代学的结合也可以对泥沙的分布方式提供重要的限制。 (C)2015 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号