首页> 外文期刊>Managing Service Quality >An inter-industry comparison of quality management practices and performance
【24h】

An inter-industry comparison of quality management practices and performance

机译:行业间质量管理实践和绩效的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper investigates similarities and differences in total quality management practices across different industry groups such as the service, manufacturing, and construction industries. The study also investigates the relationship between the quality management practices and business performance by industry category. A survey was conducted using Powell's framework as a basis, and sent to Queensland businesses. A total of 140 responses were received - 58 from the service sector, 62 from the manufacturing sector, and 20 from the construction sector. The results suggest that there are some common factors including value chain integration, efficiency and employee involvement, though the composition of quality management practices comprising these factors differed somewhat between industries. The results reveal that value chain integration in particular appears to be an important factor for quality management in each of the industries examined. The results of MANOVA analyses suggest evidence of an association between some of the quality management practices and performance for the service and manufacturing industries but not for the construction industry.
机译:本文调查了服务,制造和建筑行业等不同行业组在总体质量管理实践中的异同。该研究还按行业类别调查了质量管理实践与业务绩效之间的关系。进行了一项以鲍威尔框架为基础的调查,并将调查结果发送给了昆士兰州的企业。总共收到了140份答复,其中58份来自服务业,62份来自制造业,20份来自建筑业。结果表明存在一些共同因素,包括价值链整合,效率和员工参与度,尽管各行业之间包含这些因素的质量管理实践的构成有所不同。结果表明,特别是价值链整合似乎是所考察的每个行业中质量管理的重要因素。 MANOVA分析的结果表明,服务业和制造业的一些质量管理实践与绩效之间存在关联,而建筑业则没有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号