首页> 外文期刊>Canadian Journal of Animal Science >Comparison of the fermentation characteristics, aerobic stability and nutritive value of barley and corn silages ensiled with or without a mixed bacterial inoculant.
【24h】

Comparison of the fermentation characteristics, aerobic stability and nutritive value of barley and corn silages ensiled with or without a mixed bacterial inoculant.

机译:比较有或没有混合细菌接种剂的大麦和玉米青贮饲料的发酵特性,好氧稳定性和营养价值。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Barley (Hordeum vulgar L.) and corn (Zea mays) silage are the most commonly used forages in feedlot diets in western Canada, and are often inoculated in an effort to improve their preservation and quality. However, the relative value of these two forages in feedlot diets or their responses to inoculation have not previously been compared. Whole-crop barley (B) and corn (C) forage were ensiled for 63 and 77 d, respectively, in both mini silos and Ag BagsReg. without and with inoculation [Lactobacillus plantarum, Enterococcus faecium, Pediococcus acidilactici at 1.0x105 CFU g-1 forage; inoculated barley (IB), inoculated corn (IC)]. At the end of the ensiling period in mini silos, the pH of C and IC was lower (P<0.001) than B and IB silage, but lactate:acetate was higher (P<0.001) in IB than other silages (8:1 vs. ~4:1). Inoculation did not affect dry matter (DM) loss during ensiling, but losses in barley were higher (P<0.001) than in corn silage. Barley silage appeared to be more stable than corn after 2 d of aerobic exposure. Inoculation of barley or corn did not affect in situ organic matter disappearance (OMD) or DM intake, average daily gain (ADG) or feed efficiency of steers. However, steers fed barley silage had a higher (P=0.037) DM intake, ADG (P=0.002) and improved (P=0.002) feed efficiency compared with those fed corn silage. The inoculant was more effective at improving the fermentation and aerobic stability of barley as compared with corn, and growth and feed efficiency of cattle fed barley silage was superior to those fed corn silage.Digital Object Identifier http://dx.doi.org/10.4141/CJAS10071
机译:大麦( Hordeum vulgar L.)和玉米( Zea mays )青贮饲料是加拿大西部肥育场饲粮中最常用的草料,并经常接种以改善它们他们的保存和质量。但是,这两种草料在育肥场日粮中的相对价值或其对接种的反应以前没有进行过比较。在小粮仓和Ag BagsReg中,分别对全麦大麦(B)和玉米(C)饲料进行青贮63 d和77 d。不接种和接种[1.0i10 5 CFU g 的[植物乳杆菌,粪肠球菌,<乳酸>乳酸二球菌 -1 饲料;接种大麦(IB),接种玉米(IC)]。在小型筒仓的结谷期结束时,C和IC的pH值低于 IB青贮( P <0.001),而乳酸盐:乙酸盐则更高( P <0.001)比其他青贮饲料(8:1 vs.〜4:1)。接种不会影响青贮过程中干物质(DM)的损失,但是大麦的损失( P <0.001)高于玉米青贮的损失。有氧暴露2 d后,大麦青贮饲料似乎比玉米更稳定。大麦或玉米的接种不会影响原位有机物的消失(OMD)或DM的摄入量,日平均增重(ADG)或ste牛的饲料效率。但是,饲喂大麦青贮饲料的ers牛具有更高的( P = 0.037)DM摄入量,ADG( P = 0.002)并有所改善( P = 0.002 )饲料效率与饲喂玉米青贮饲料相比。与玉米相比,该接种剂在改善大麦的发酵和有氧稳定性方面更有效,饲喂大麦青贮饲料的牛的生长和饲料效率要优于饲喂玉米青贮饲料的动物。数字对象标识符http://dx.doi.org/ 10.4141 / CJAS10071

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号