首页> 外文期刊>Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research >Learning Opportunity and Preparedness for Practice:Perceptions from Dietetics Programs in Canada
【24h】

Learning Opportunity and Preparedness for Practice:Perceptions from Dietetics Programs in Canada

机译:学习机会和实践准备:加拿大饮食学课程的感悟

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose: This study determined dietetics trainees' and program coordinators' perceptions about trainees' preparedness to practice, based on Dietitians of Canada's 145 competency statements. Depth and breadth of learning opportunity were also determined with definitions of these two concepts based on Elliott's view of professional education and practice.Methods: Research questions were: 1. How prepared were trainees for practice 2. What were the depth and breadth of learning opportunity in assessment, planning, implementation and evaluation 3. How many learning opportunities were there in professional practice and communication 4. Did responses vary between integrated programs and internships or between trainees and program coordinatorsResults: Of 313 trainees, 168 54%olg:fre responded and 23 72%olg:fre of 32 coordinators responded. Preparedness was rated as well prepared or better for 25 56%olg:fre of the 45 main competencies. For every competency, preparedness ratings were higher in integrated programs than in internships. Learning opportunities were rated as sufficient in depth and breaddi or number for 88 61%olg:fre of die 145 competency statements. Low ratings for preparedness were accompanied by low ratings for depdi and/or breadthor number of learning opportunities.Conclusions: The notion of depth and breadth is useful as a framework to assess learning opportunities for developing entry-level competence.
机译:目的:本研究根据加拿大营养师的145份能力声明,确定了饮食学学员和计划协调员对学员准备练习的看法。还根据埃利奥特的专业教育和实践观点,通过对这两个概念的定义,确定了学习机会的深度和广度。方法:研究问题是:1.学员对实践的准备程度如何2.学习机会的深度和广度是什么在评估,计划,实施和评估中。3.在专业实践和交流中有多少学习机会。4.在综合计划和实习之间,还是在学员和计划协调员之间,答案是否有所不同?结果:在313名学员中,有168个54%的olg:fre和23 72%olg:32位协调员的回答。在45个主要能力中,有25个56%olg:fre的准备水平被评为充分准备或更好。对于每种能力,综合项目的准备等级都高于实习。对于145个能力陈述中的88 61%olg:fre,学习机会的深度和面包度或数量被评为足够。对准备的低评分伴随着对学习机会的深度和/或广度的低评分。结论:深度和广度的概念可作为评估用于开发入门级能力的学习机会的框架。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号