首页> 外文期刊>Canadian journal of anesthesia: Journal canadien d'anesthesie >Co-administration of alfentanil-propofol improves laryngeal mask airway insertion compared to fentanyl-propofol.
【24h】

Co-administration of alfentanil-propofol improves laryngeal mask airway insertion compared to fentanyl-propofol.

机译:与芬太尼-丙泊酚相比,阿芬太尼-丙泊酚的共同给药可改善喉罩的气道插入。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: Insertion of the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) requires sufficient depth of anesthesia to relax the jaw and obtund airway reflexes. Recent studies suggest that the short-acting opioid alfentanil provides the best insertion conditions. We therefore compared the insertion conditions following co-administration of alfentanil-propofol with more commonly used fentanyl-propofol. METHODS: One hundred forty ASA I or II patients, age 18-81 yr, requiring minor surgery were recruited. They were randomized to receive either alfentanil (10 microg x kg(-1); n = 73) or fentanyl (1 microg x kg(-1); n = 67) with propofol (2.5 mg x kg(-1)) 90 sec prior to LMA (size 3 or 4) insertion. A six variable (mouth opening, ease of insertion, swallowing, coughing, movement and laryngospasm) three-point (nil / partial / total) score was used to assess insertion conditions. Duration of post-insertion apnea was recorded. Insertion conditions were compared using Chi-square for trends. RESULTS: The two groups were demographically similar. Mouth opening and ease of insertion were not improved with alfentanil co-administration. Alfentanil-propofol reduced the incidence of swallowing, gagging, movement and laryngospasm (P < 0.05), with 29% (alfentanil) compared to 45% (fentanyl) of patients responding (P = 0.05) to LMA insertion. Apnea [mean (SD)] following alfentanil lasted 154 (139) sec compared to 82 (61) sec following fentanyl (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Co-administration of alfentanil-propofol provided better insertion conditions than fentanyl-propofol, though apnea was prolonged by 72 sec.
机译:目的:插入喉罩气道(LMA)需要足够的麻醉深度,以放松颌骨和气管反射。最近的研究表明,短效阿片类药物阿芬太尼提供了最佳的插入条件。因此,我们比较了将阿芬太尼-丙泊酚与更常用的芬太尼-丙泊酚并用后的插入条件。方法:招募了需要小手术的年龄在18-81岁之间的ASA I或II患者140例。他们被随机分配接受丙泊酚(2.5 mg x kg(-1))的阿芬太尼(10 microg x kg(-1); n = 73)或芬太尼(1 microg x kg(-1); n = 67)90 LMA(尺寸3或4)插入前一秒。使用六个变量(嘴张开,插入的容易程度,吞咽,咳嗽,运动和喉痉挛)的三分(零分/部分/总分)得分来评估插入条件。记录插入后呼吸暂停的持续时间。使用卡方比较趋势的插入条件。结果:两组在人口统计学上相似。联合使用阿芬太尼不能改善张口和插入的便利性。阿芬太尼-丙泊酚降低了吞咽,作呕,运动和喉痉挛的发生率(P <0.05),其中29%(阿芬太尼)与45%(芬太尼)对LMA插入有反应的患者相比(P = 0.05)。阿芬太尼后的呼吸暂停[平均值(SD)]持续154(139)秒,而芬太尼后为82(61)秒(P = 0.001)。结论:尽管将呼吸暂停延长了72秒,但与芬太尼-丙泊酚合用时,与阿芬太尼-丙泊酚合用可提供更好的插入条件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号