首页> 外文期刊>Canadian journal of anesthesia: Journal canadien d'anesthesie >Improved bowel function after gynecological surgery with epidural bupivacaine-fentanyl than bupivacaine-morphine infusion.
【24h】

Improved bowel function after gynecological surgery with epidural bupivacaine-fentanyl than bupivacaine-morphine infusion.

机译:与布比卡因-吗啡输注相比,妇科手术后硬膜外用布比卡因-芬太尼改善肠功能。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To compare postoperative gastrointestinal recovery between continuous epidural bupivacaine-fentanyl and bupivacaine-morphine. METHODS: In a blinded, randomized, prospective trial, 60 women undergoing surgery for gynecologic cancer were studied. Anesthesia was provided by a combined general/epidural (L2-3 catheter) technique without epidural opioids. Postoperative epidural analgesia was by continuous infusion of bupivacaine 0.1% with either morphine 0.05 mg x ml(-1) (BM) or fentanyl 5 microg x ml(-1) (BF). Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores for pain at rest and during movement, and the return of bowel function were collected for three days and the duration of hospitalization were noted. RESULTS: On POD-1, 18.5% of patients in the BM group had emesis compared with none in the BF group (P = 0.038) and fewer patients in the BM group tolerated clear oral fluids (11.1% BM vs 40.6% BF, P = 0.025). These differences became insignificant on POD-2 and 3. Median pain scores were comparable at rest and ranged from 10-20 in the BM group vs 0-20 in the BF group over the three days. Similarly, median pain scores with movement respectively ranged from 20-25 and 20-30 in the BF and BM groups. The mean duration of hospitalization was longer in the BM group (5.7 +/- 2.4) vs BF (4.5 +/- 1.2 days), P = 0.017. CONCLUSION: Epidural BM and BF provided equally effective postoperative analgesia at rest and during movement. Compared with BM, epidural BF is associated with less emesis and an increased ability to tolerate oral fluids on POD-1 and an overall shorter hospital stay.
机译:目的:比较连续硬膜外布比卡因-芬太尼和布比卡因-吗啡的术后胃肠道恢复情况。方法:在一项双盲,随机,前瞻性试验中,研究了60名接受妇科手术治疗的妇女。麻醉是通过联合全身/硬膜外(L2-3导管)技术进行的,没有硬膜外阿片类药物。术后硬膜外镇痛是通过连续输注0.1%布比卡因和0.05 mg x ml(-1)吗啡或fentanyl 5 microg x ml(-1)(BF)来进行的。视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分用于休息和运动过程中的疼痛,以及肠功能的恢复,持续三天,并记录住院时间。结果:在POD-1上,BM组有18.5%的患者有呕吐,而BF组则没有(P = 0.038),并且BM组耐受清液的患者较少(11.1%BM vs 40.6%BF,P = 0.025)。这些差异在POD-2和3上变得无关紧要。在三天内,中位疼痛评分在休息时相当,在BM组为10-20,而在BF组为0-20。同样,BF组和BM组的运动中位疼痛评分分别为20-25和20-30。 BM组的平均住院时间更长(5.7 +/- 2.4),而BF组(4.5 +/- 1.2天)更长,P = 0.017。结论:硬膜外BM和BF在休息和运动过程中均提供相同的术后镇痛效果。与BM相比,硬膜外BF呕吐较少,耐受POD-1上的口腔液体的能力增强,并且住院时间总体较短。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号