...
首页> 外文期刊>Foster Natural Gas Report >Apache Corp. and Noble Energy Protest Dauphin Island Gathering Partners’ Storm Surcharge Filing, Claiming That Some Charges Were Not Incurred in Connection to Any Storms; Standing Firm, Dauphin Island Disagrees
【24h】

Apache Corp. and Noble Energy Protest Dauphin Island Gathering Partners’ Storm Surcharge Filing, Claiming That Some Charges Were Not Incurred in Connection to Any Storms; Standing Firm, Dauphin Island Disagrees

机译:Apache Corp.和Noble Energy抗议Dauphin Island Gathering Partners的风暴附加费归档,声称没有因任何风暴而产生某些费用;多芬岛常驻事务所不同意

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Dauphin Island Gathering Partners’ recent annual storm surcharge filing (RP14-566) incorrectly included charges that were spent in compliance with the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement’s (BSEE’s) Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) platform requirements and were not actually incurred in connection to any storms, said shippers Apache Corp. and Noble Energy, Inc., in a March 12 joint protest filing at FERC. The dissenters asked the Commission to deny Dauphin Island’s attempt to include $1,787,679 of “ineligible bracing project costs.” Firing back in a March 19 answer, Dauphin Island insisted that the bracing project costs were required by the BSEE as a result of Hurricanes Ivan, Katrina and Rita in 2004 and 2005, and are eligible costs in accordance with its tariff.
机译:Dauphin岛聚会伙伴最近的年度风暴附加费申报(RP14-566)错误地包括了为符合安全和环境执法局(BSEE)的外部大陆架(OCS)平台要求而支出的费用,而实际上并非与这些费用有关托运人Apache Corp.和Noble Energy,Inc.在3月12日向FERC提交的联合抗议文件中表示,任何风暴。持不同政见者要求委员会否认多芬岛试图将“ 1,787,679美元”的“不合格支撑项目费用”包括在内。在3月19日的回答中,多芬岛坚持认为,支撑项目的费用是BSEE所要求的,原因是飓风Ivan,Katrina和Rita分别在2004年和2005年,并且符合其资费标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号