...
首页> 外文期刊>Forest Ecology and Management >A comparison of selected parametric and imputation methods for estimating snag density and snag quality attributes. (Special Issue: Emerging methods for handling missing data in forest ecology and management applications.)
【24h】

A comparison of selected parametric and imputation methods for estimating snag density and snag quality attributes. (Special Issue: Emerging methods for handling missing data in forest ecology and management applications.)

机译:比较估计参断密度和参断质量属性的选定参数方法和插补方法。 (特刊:森林生态学和管理应用中处理缺失数据的新兴方法。)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Snags (standing dead trees) are an essential structural component of forests. Because wildlife use of snags depends on size and decay stage, snag density estimation without any information about snag quality attributes is of little value for wildlife management decision makers. Little work has been done to develop models that allow multivariate estimation of snag density by snag quality class. Using climate, topography, Landsat TM data, stand age and forest type collected for 2356 forested Forest Inventory and Analysis plots in western Washington and western Oregon, we evaluated two multivariate techniques for their abilities to estimate density of snags by three decay classes. The density of live trees and snags in three decay classes (D1: recently dead, little decay; D2: decay, without top, some branches and bark missing; D3: extensive decay, missing bark and most branches) with diameter at breast height (DBH) >=12.7 cm was estimated using a nonparametric random forest nearest neighbor imputation technique (RF) and a parametric two-stage model (QPORD), for which the number of trees per hectare was estimated with a Quasipoisson model in the first stage and the probability of belonging to a tree status class (live, D1, D2, D3) was estimated with an ordinal regression model in the second stage. The presence of large snags with DBH >=50 cm was predicted using a logistic regression and RF imputation. Because of the more homogenous conditions on private forest lands, snag density by decay class was predicted with higher accuracies on private forest lands than on public lands, while presence of large snags was more accurately predicted on public lands, owing to the higher prevalence of large snags on public lands. RF outperformed the QPORD model in terms of percent accurate predictions, while QPORD provided smaller root mean square errors in predicting snag density by decay class. The logistic regression model achieved more accurate presence/absence classification of large snags than the RF imputation approach. Adjusting the decision threshold to account for unequal size for presence and absence classes is more straightforward for the logistic regression than for the RF imputation approach. Overall, model accuracies were poor in this study, which can be attributed to the poor predictive quality of the explanatory variables and the large range of forest types and geographic conditions observed in the data.Digital Object Identifier http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.06.041
机译:障碍物(站立的枯树)是森林的重要结构组成部分。由于野生生物对障碍物的利用取决于大小和衰减阶段,因此对于障碍物质量属性没有任何信息的障碍物密度估计对于野生动植物管理决策者来说几乎没有价值。很少有工作来开发模型,该模型允许根据障碍物质量等级对障碍物密度进行多变量估计。利用气候,地形,Landsat TM数据,林分年龄和为华盛顿州西部和俄勒冈州西部的2356个森林森林调查和分析地块收集的森林类型,我们评估了两种多变量技术根据三种衰减类别估算断枝密度的能力。三种衰落类别中的活树和断枝的密度(D1:最近死亡,几乎没有腐烂; D2:没有顶部的腐烂,缺少一些树枝和树皮; D3:大量腐烂,缺少树皮和大多数树枝),直径与胸高相同(使用非参数随机森林最近邻插值技术(RF)和参数两阶段模型(QPORD)估计> = 12.7 cm的DBH),第一阶段使用Quasipoisson模型估计每公顷树木的数量,在第二阶段,使用序数回归模型估算了属于树木状态类别(活动,D1,D2,D3)的概率。使用逻辑回归和RF插补预测DBH> = 50 cm的大障碍物的存在。由于私有林地的条件更加均一,因此预测私有林地上按衰减等级划分的断枝密度具有比公共林更高的准确度,而由于公共林地上较高的患病率,可以更准确地预测大断枝的存在。扎在公共土地上。就准确度预测百分比而言,RF优于QPORD模型,而QPORD在按衰减类别预测断枝密度时提供了较小的均方根误差。与RF插补方法相比,逻辑回归模型可对大障碍进行更准确的存在/不存在分类。与逻辑插补方法相比,对于逻辑回归,调整决策阈值以解决存在和缺失类的大小不相等的问题更为直接。总体而言,这项研究的模型准确性很差,这可以归因于解释变量的预测质量差以及数据中观察到的大范围森林类型和地理条件.Digital Object Identifier http://dx.doi.org /10.1016/j.foreco.2011.06.041

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号