...
首页> 外文期刊>Forest Ecology and Management >Visual detection based distance sampling offers efficient density estimation for distinctive low abundance tropical forest tree species in complex terrain.
【24h】

Visual detection based distance sampling offers efficient density estimation for distinctive low abundance tropical forest tree species in complex terrain.

机译:基于视觉检测的距离采样为复杂地形中独特的低丰度热带林木物种提供了有效的密度估计。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Good density estimates for low abundance tree species are costly to achieve especially in rugged or disturbed forest landscapes. More efficient methods would be of considerable value to managers and conservationists. Here we assess a method that has been neglected in this context. We examine and compare distance-based visual detection line-transects and conventional fixed-width transects for assessing a distinctive low abundance species of conservation significance, Myrianthus holstii Engl., in three separate areas, within a steep, disturbed mountain rain forest. Precision and implied accuracy appeared substantially better with the visual detection line-transect than with the fixed-width transect for equivalent costs and effort at all three landscapes but as the two methods provide different estimates there are questions of possible bias in both approaches. We discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the distance approach and suggest some recommendations concerning its application. We conclude that the distance method is suited to low density species that are easily identified, even when understorey vegetation and terrain severely impair visibility. However, due to the differences in detection probabilities, populations need to be stratified both by tree size and context.Digital Object Identifier http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.09.020
机译:对低丰度树种进行良好的密度估算非常昂贵,尤其是在崎or不平的森林景观中。更加有效的方法对管理者和保护主义者而言将具有重要价值。在这里,我们评估一种在这种情况下被忽略的方法。我们检查并比较了基于距离的视觉检测线样线和常规固定宽度样条,以评估在三个不同区域,陡峭区域内具有保护意义的独特低丰度物种 Myrianthus holstii Engl。不安的山区雨林。在所有三种情况下,视觉检测线样线的精确度和隐含精度似乎比固定宽度样条线要好得多,但是在这两种情况下,等价的成本和工作量却是相同的,但是由于这两种方法提供了不同的估计值,因此这两种方法都有可能存在偏差。我们讨论了距离方法的优缺点,并提出了有关其应用的一些建议。我们得出结论,即使地下植被和地形严重损害了能见度,距离方法也适用于易于识别的低密度物种。但是,由于检测概率的差异,需要根据树的大小和上下文对种群进行分层。数字对象标识符http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.09.020

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号