...
首页> 外文期刊>Forensic science, medicine, and pathology >Comment on: A commentary on changing infant death rates and a plea to use sudden infant death syndrome as a cause of death
【24h】

Comment on: A commentary on changing infant death rates and a plea to use sudden infant death syndrome as a cause of death

机译:评论:关于改变婴儿死亡率的评论,以及呼吁使用婴儿猝死综合症作为死亡原因

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Krous [1] recently published "a plea to use sudden infant death syndrome as a cause of death" instead of a cause of death related to asphyxial risk factors that are non-fatal per se. It is interesting to note that Gilbert-Barness and Barness [2] published an invited editorial in 1993 that made a completely opposite plea. They reasoned that SIDS is not a cause of death, but rather a term for a death of unknown cause, and concluded as follows:We make a plea that the term SIDS [Sudden Infant Death Syndrome] be abandoned and the diagnosis sudden infant death be substituted, with the qualifications implicit in each case. It is only by so doing that we will identify the causes of sudden infant death. [2]
机译:Krous [1]最近发表了“呼吁使用婴儿猝死综合症作为死亡原因”,而不是与本身不是致命的窒息危险因素相关的死亡原因。有趣的是,Gilbert-Barness和Barness [2]在1993年发表了特邀社论,提出了完全相反的请求。他们认为SIDS不是死亡原因,而是死因不明的术语,并得出以下结论:我们呼吁放弃SIDS(婴儿突然死亡综合症)一词,而应将诊断为婴儿猝死定为替换,在每种情况下都隐含资格。只有这样做,我们才能确定婴儿猝死的原因。 [2]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号