...
【24h】

Current recommendations: What is the clinician to do?

机译:当前建议:临床医生该怎么办?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Menopausal hormone therapy (HT) has complex biologic effects but continues to have an important clinical role in the management of vasomotor and other menopausal symptoms. The rational use of menopausal HT requires balancing the potential benefits and risks of treatment. Findings from the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) and other randomized clinical trials have helped to clarify the benefits and risks of HT and have provided insights to improve decision making. Several clinical characteristics have utility in identifying women for whom benefits of HT are likely to outweigh the risks. Age and time since menopause are strong predictors of health outcomes and absolute risks associated with HT, and differences by age have been particularly apparent for estrogen alone. In the WHI trial of conjugated equine estrogens (CEE) alone, younger women (50-59 years) had more favorable results for all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and the global index, but not for stroke and venous thrombosis. Age trends were less clear for CEE + medroxyprogesterone acetate, owing to increased risks of breast cancer, stroke, and venous thrombosis in all age groups. Absolute risks of adverse events were lower in younger than in older women in both trials, however. Other predictors of lower vascular risk from HT include favorable lipid status and absence of the metabolic syndrome. Transdermal administration may be associated with lower risks of venous thrombosis and stroke, but additional research is needed. The use of risk stratification and personalized risk assessment offers promise for improved benefit-risk profile and safety of HT. One approach to decision making is presented. Key elements include: assessment of whether the patient has moderate to severe menopausal symptoms, the primary indication for initiating systemic HT (vaginal estrogen may be used to treat genitourinary symptoms in the absence of vasomotor symptoms); understanding the patient's own preference regarding therapy; evaluating the patient for the presence of any contraindications to HT, as well as the time since menopause onset and baseline risks of cardiovascular disease and breast cancer; reviewing carefully the benefits and risks of treatment with the patient, giving more emphasis to absolute than to relative measures of effect; and, if HT is initiated, regularly reviewing the patient's need for continued treatment.
机译:更年期激素疗法(HT)具有复杂的生物学作用,但在血管舒缩和其他更年期症状的管理中继续发挥重要的临床作用。合理使用更年期HT需要平衡治疗的潜在收益和风险。妇女健康倡议(WHI)和其他随机临床试验的发现有助于阐明HT的益处和风险,并为改善决策提供了见识。几种临床特征可用于确定女性,其HT的益处可能超过风险。绝经后的年龄和时间是健康结果和与HT相关的绝对风险的有力预测指标,而单独雌激素的年龄差异尤为明显。仅在WHI共轭马雌激素(CEE)试验中,年轻妇女(50-59岁)在全因死亡率,心肌梗塞和总体指标方面取得了更有利的结果,但对于中风和静脉血栓形成却没有。由于所有年龄段的乳腺癌,中风和静脉血栓形成的风险增加,CEE +醋酸甲羟孕酮的年龄趋势尚不清楚。然而,在两项试验中,年轻女性的不良事件绝对风险均低于老年女性。 HT引起的较低血管风险的其他预测因素包括良好的脂质状况和代谢综合征的缺乏。经皮给药可能与静脉血栓形成和中风的风险降低有关,但还需要进一步的研究。风险分层和个性化风险评估的使用为改善HT的利益风险状况和安全性提供了希望。提出了一种决策方法。关键要素包括:评估患者是否患有中度至重度更年期症状,开始全身性HT的主要指征(在没有血管舒缩症状的情况下,可使用阴道雌激素治疗泌尿生殖系统症状);了解患者对治疗的偏好;评估患者是否存在HT的禁忌症,以及绝经开始后的时间和基线的心血管疾病和乳腺癌风险;仔细审查与患者一起治疗的益处和风险,重点是绝对而不是相对的疗效;如果开始进行HT,则应定期检查患者对继续治疗的需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号