...
首页> 外文期刊>Fertility and Sterility: Official Journal of the American Fertility Society, Pacific Coast Fertility Society, and the Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society >A randomized controlled trial of NuvaRing versus combined oral contraceptive pills for pretreatment in in vitro fertilization cycles.
【24h】

A randomized controlled trial of NuvaRing versus combined oral contraceptive pills for pretreatment in in vitro fertilization cycles.

机译:NuvaRing与联合口服避孕药在体外受精周期中进行预处理的随机对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether use of the NuvaRing (Merck) for pretreatment in IVF cycles would result in better cycle control and patient satisfaction versus a 30-mug oral contraceptive (OC) pill. DESIGN: A prospective randomized, controlled study. SETTING: An academic, hospital-based fertility clinic in Toronto, Canada. PATIENT(S): Patients 18-37 years old, undergoing their first IVF or IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycle. INTERVENTION(S): OC versus NuvaRing for IVF pre-treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Patient satisfaction, ovarian suppression, and IVF cycle outcomes. RESULT(S): Demographic data were similar in both groups. There were no significant differences in side effects between the NuvaRing and OC pill group with the exception of more breast discomfort in the OC pill group. There were no differences in the protocols, days of stimulation, and number of oocytes between the groups. Patients in the OC pill group had more embryos on day 3 and more patients had excess embryos for freezing. The number of embryos transferred and clinical pregnancy rates (PR) were similar between the two groups, although more patients in the NuvaRing group had cycles cancelled for poor stimulation. CONCLUSION(S): There was no significant benefit in patient tolerability or side effects with the NuvaRing versus the OC pill for IVF pretreatment; however, side effects overall were low in both groups. Clinical PRs were similar; however, the NuvaRing group had more cancelled cycles and fewer excess embryos for freezing. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: #NCT01298128.
机译:目的:确定与30杯口服避孕药(OC)相比,在IVF周期中使用NuvaRing(Merck)进行预处理是否会导致更好的周期控制和患者满意度。设计:一项前瞻性随机对照研究。地点:位于加拿大多伦多的一家学术型医院生育诊所。患者:18-37岁的患者,正在接受首次IVF或IVF /胞浆内精子注射(ICSI)周期。干预:IVF预处理的OC与NuvaRing。主要观察指标:患者满意度,卵巢抑制和IVF周期结果。结果:两组的人口统计学数据相似。 NuvaRing和OC丸组之间的副作用无显着差异,除了OC丸组中乳房不适更多。两组之间的方案,刺激天数和卵母细胞数量没有差异。 OC丸组的患者在第3天有更多的胚胎,更多的患者有过多的胚胎需要冷冻。两组之间转移的胚胎数和临床妊娠率(PR)相似,尽管NuvaRing组中的更多患者因刺激不良而取消了周期。结论:与IV预处理的OC丸相比,NuvaRing对患者的耐受性或副作用无明显益处;但是,两组的总体副作用均较低。临床PR相似。但是,NuvaRing组的取消周期更多,冷冻的多余胚胎更少。临床试验注册:#NCT01298128。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号