...
首页> 外文期刊>GeoJournal >Social Cohesion; Is it sufficient? Migrant communities in two disadvantaged neighborhoods in Istanbul
【24h】

Social Cohesion; Is it sufficient? Migrant communities in two disadvantaged neighborhoods in Istanbul

机译:社会凝聚力;够了吗?伊斯坦布尔两个弱势社区的移民社区

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Planners assume that old neighbourhoods have an atmosphere in which social relations can easily flourish. They also regard the strong social ties within a neighborhood as the guarantee for the success of housing rehabilitation. This article argues that existence of social cohesion in a neighbourhood is not necessarily and advantage in a process of modernisation and rehabilitation. In some cases the community may constitute a closed 'island' especially in places where communities have historically inherited an hierarchical character. The article is based on a recent research project dealing with urban communities in inner city areas of Istanbul, especially those containing migrant populations which seemingly have strong community ties. The historical background of the community from the Ottoman period is examined in the first part of the article. The roots of the community as a territorial administrative unit (mahalle) and its modification in contemporary migrant communities are analysed. The second part of the article presents the results of two case studies. One of the case studies is a social housing district where the migrant community is mixed and social relations with the rest of the city are relatively well developed. The other case study area is an historical district where strong social ties create an introverted character of the community in spite of its central location. The result of the study reveals that urban 'communities' in a city like Istanbul have both negative and positive aspects. Primarily it is important to assess and understand the degree of 'opennes' of the community to the outer world. In any action to be taken planners should look not only inside the community, but also at its 'outer' relations.
机译:规划者认为,旧社区的氛围很容易使社会关系蓬勃发展。他们还认为,社区内的牢固社会联系是住房修复成功的保证。本文认为,在现代化和复兴过程中,社区凝聚力的存在并不一定是一种优势。在某些情况下,社区可能构成封闭的“岛屿”,尤其是在社区历史上继承了等级特征的地方。本文基于最近的一项研究项目,该项目涉及伊斯坦布尔市中心地区的城市社区,尤其是那些似乎与社区有着紧密联系的移民人口。本文的第一部分考察了奥斯曼帝国时期的社区历史背景。分析了社区作为领土行政单位(mahalle)的根源及其在当代移民社区中的变迁。本文的第二部分介绍了两个案例研究的结果。案例研究之一是一个社会住房区,那里的移民社区是混合的,与城市其他地方的社会关系相对发达。另一个案例研究区是一个历史悠久的地区,尽管社区处于中心位置,但牢固的社会联系在社区中形成了内向的性格。研究结果表明,像伊斯坦布尔这样的城市中的城市“社区”既有积极方面也有消极方面。首先,重要的是评估和了解社区对外部世界的“开放度”。规划人员在采取任何行动时,不仅应关注社区内部,还应关注社区的“外部”关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号