...
首页> 外文期刊>Feed Compounder >WHY LIFT THE BAN IN EUROPE? Are processed animal proteins of unique nutritional value in formulating rations for food producing animals?
【24h】

WHY LIFT THE BAN IN EUROPE? Are processed animal proteins of unique nutritional value in formulating rations for food producing animals?

机译:为什么取消欧洲禁令?在为食用动物配制口粮时,加工过的动物蛋白是否具有独特的营养价值?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Since the EU banned animal by-products in rations in 2001 feed compounders have been forced to replace animal proteins with a variety of alternatives. While livestock has remained well fed, many producers complain of rising input costs and competitivedisadvantage as a result, which leads to the questions; how efficient are the alternatives, and what are the environmental and financial costs? The EU is now considering lifting the ban on feed use of processed animal proteins from category 3 by-products fit for human consumption at the point of slaughter. Based on proven scientific evidence, it is considering revising current legislation and says that with strict controls in place, lifting the ban could help address the continents' 70%a protein deficit and level the playing field for European farmers.
机译:自2001年欧盟禁止在口粮中使用动物副产品以来,饲料配混者被迫用多种替代品替代动物蛋白。尽管牲畜饲养良好,但许多生产者抱怨投入成本上升和竞争劣势,这引发了问题。替代方案的效率如何?环境和财务成本是多少?欧盟现在正在考虑取消禁止在屠宰时食用适合人类食用的3类副产品中的动物蛋白加工饲料的禁令。基于可靠的科学证据,该组织正在考虑修订现行法律,并表示,通过严格的控制措施,取消禁令可以帮助解决非洲大陆70%a的蛋白质短缺问题,并为欧洲农民创造公平的竞争环境。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号