首页> 外文期刊>Faculty dental journal >Devolution and diversity: does it make a difference?
【24h】

Devolution and diversity: does it make a difference?

机译:权力下放和多样性:有什么不同吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This series of articles on dentistry in the devolved nations makes interesting reading, together with reports on healthcare in general across the UK. It is clear that the 'National' Health Service is not one system but a family of four systems, and this should be reflected in our language. All have the same 'parental' NHS roots and thus there are still similarities. Significant public resources remain invested in NHS dentistry, supported by co-payments from adults. Broadly, there are still three branches of the dental profession. General dental services (GDS) remain the main provider, while community dental services (public dental services in Scotland; community/ salaried dental services in England) are more focused on providing special care dentistry. Specialist care is increasingly available outwith hospitals and services are increasingly led by need, as evidenced by orthodontic provision being restricted on the basis of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need. Preventive care is increasing in prominence, oral health appears to be improving further, and divergent change has become the 'norm', albeit at a different pace.
机译:这一系列有关流放国家的牙科的文章,以及整个英国有关医疗保健的报告,都引起了有趣的阅读。显然,“国家”卫生服务不是一个系统,而是四个系统的系列,这应该用我们的语言来体现。它们都有相同的“父母” NHS根,因此仍然存在相似之处。在成年人的自付费用的支持下,大量的公共资源仍然投资于NHS牙科。从广义上讲,牙科专业仍然有三个分支。普通牙科服务(GDS)仍然是主要的提供者,而社区牙科服务(苏格兰的公共牙科服务;英格兰的社区/有薪牙科服务)则更侧重于提供特殊护理牙科。随着医院的需求,越来越多的专家开始提供护理,服务也越来越多地以需求为导向,正畸治疗的需求受到正畸治疗需求指数的限制,这证明了这一点。预防保健的重要性在增加,口腔健康似乎正在进一步改善,分歧的变化已成为“常态”,尽管步伐不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号