...
首页> 外文期刊>Ear, nose and throat journal >Comparative study of intranasal septal splints and nasal packs in patients undergoing nasal septal surgery
【24h】

Comparative study of intranasal septal splints and nasal packs in patients undergoing nasal septal surgery

机译:鼻中隔手术患者鼻中隔夹板和鼻腔包装的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We conducted a prospective, comparative, interventional study to evaluate the role of intranasal septal splints and to compare the results of this type of support with those of conventional nasal packing. Our study population was made up of 60 patients, aged 18 to 50 years, who had undergone septoplasty for the treatment of a symptomatic deviation of the nasal septum at our tertiary care referral hospital. These patients were randomly divided into two groups according to the type of nasal support they would receive: 30 patients (25 men and 5 women, mean age: 23.3 yr) received bilateral intranasal septal splints and the other 30 (26 men and 4 women, mean age: 22.4 yr) underwent anterior nasal packing. Outcomes parameters included postoperative pain and a number of other variables. At 24 and 48 hours postoperatively, the splint group had significantly lower mean pain scores (p < 0.05). At 48 hours, the splint group experienced significantly fewer instances of nasal bleeding (p < 0.01), swelling over the face and nose (p < 0.01), watering of the eyes (p < 0.01), nasal discharge (p = 0.028), nasal obstruction (p < 0.001), and feeding difficulty (p = 0.028). Likewise, mean pain scores during splint or pack removal were significantly lower in the splint group (p < 0.01). At the 6-week follow-up, only 2 patients (6.7%) in the splint group exhibited a residual deformity, compared with 8 patients (26.7%) in the packing group (p = 0.038). Finally, no patient in the splint group had an intranasal adhesion at follow-up, while 4 (13.3%) in the packing group did (p < 0.05).
机译:我们进行了一项前瞻性,比较性,介入性研究,以评估鼻中隔夹板的作用,并将这种类型的支持结果与常规鼻填塞进行比较。我们的研究人群由60名年龄在18至50岁之间的患者组成,他们在我们的三级转诊医院接受了鼻中隔成形术以治疗鼻中隔的症状。根据接受的鼻支持类型将这些患者随机分为两组:30例(25例男性和5例女性,平均年龄:23​​.3岁)接受双侧鼻中隔夹板,另外30例(26例男性和4例女性,平均年龄:22.4岁)接受了前鼻填充。结果参数包括术后疼痛和许多其他变量。术后24和48小时,夹板组的平均疼痛评分明显降低(p <0.05)。在48小时时,夹板组的鼻腔出血次数(p <0.01),面部和鼻子肿胀(p <0.01),眼睛流泪(p <0.01),鼻涕(p = 0.028),鼻塞(p <0.001)和进食困难(p = 0.028)。同样,夹板组中去除夹板或背包时的平均疼痛评分也明显较低(p <0.01)。在6周的随访中,夹板组中只有2例患者(6.7%)表现出残余畸形,而包装组中只有8例(26.7%)(p = 0.038)。最后,夹板组中没有患者在随访时有鼻内粘连,而包装组中有4名(13.3%)有鼻内粘连(p <0.05)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号