...
首页> 外文期刊>Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature >Anolis chvysolepis Dumeril & Bibron, 1837 (Reptilia, Squamata): proposed precedence over Draconum nitens Wagler, 1830
【24h】

Anolis chvysolepis Dumeril & Bibron, 1837 (Reptilia, Squamata): proposed precedence over Draconum nitens Wagler, 1830

机译:Anolis chvysolepis DumeYil和Bibron,1837年(Reptilia,Squamata)提出优先于Dragons face Todd,1830年

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The purpose of this application, under Articles 2.3.6, 23.12 and 81 of the Code, is to conserve the name Anolis chrysolepis Dumeril & Bibron, 1837, for a polytypic species of biogeographic importance. An older, less-used name Anolis nitens (Wagler, 1830), was rejected in a major revision (Vanzolini & Williams, 1970) as a name 'of uncertain application [and] uncertain geographical provenance', the first term being equivalent to nomen dubium as denned in the Code. The specific name nitens was published with a 4-line description in the monotypic genus Draconura; the type locality ('America') is vague and the holotype is unknown. It is indeed a nomen dubium that cannot unambiguously be assigned to any known lizard, although the possibility that the brief color description might prove diagnostic of a species waiting rediscovery cannot be rejected. Article 23.3.6 of the Code allows authors to use the junior name Anolis chrysolepis as valid. However, although never in prevailing usage historically, Anolis nitens nonetheless remains in competing use because of prior (and arguable) interpretation of Article 23. It is a major source of instability. It is proposed that the name Anolis chrysolepis Dumeril & Bibron, 1837, be given precedence over Draconura nitens Wagler, 1830, whenever the two are considered to be synonyms.
机译:根据《守则》第2.3.6条,第23.12条和第81条,本申请的目的是保留名称Anolis chrysolepis Dumeril&Bibron,1837,以作为具有生物地理意义的多型物种。较旧的较少使用的名称Anolis nitens(Wagler,1830年)在主要修订中被拒绝(Vanzolini和Williams,1970年),其名称为“不确定的应用[和]不确定的地理起源”,第一个术语等同于nomen守则中规定的。 nitens的具体名称在单型Draconura属中以4行描述发布;类型局部性('America')含糊不清,而整型未知。尽管不能简单地描述简短的颜色描述可以证明对等待重新发现的物种进行诊断的可能性,但确实可以将它毫无疑问地分配给任何已知的蜥蜴。 《守则》第23.3.6条允许作者使用别名Anolis chrysolepis作为有效名称。但是,尽管历史上从未使用过,但Anolis nitens仍然在竞争性使用中,因为先前对第23条进行了解释(并且有争议)。这是不稳定的主要原因。建议将Anolis chrysolepis Dumeril&Bibron(1837)的名称优先于Draconura nitens Wagler(1830),只要它们被视为同义词。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号